Talk:1989 World Series

Assessment

aside from a couple of lists and scores by inning, this is a short dry article without breadth or compelling prose. it needs more depth, breadth and flavour to become a B class article. also the graphics are pathetic and it could use some print references if the article is truly notable. Anlace 15:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Could also do with mentioning the small matter of who actually won the Series, too... 81.104.160.179

The 1908 World Series wasn't a crosstown Series. It was Chicago Cubs vs. Detroit Tigers

Fair use rationale for Image:1989 World Series ABC Sports Graphic.JPG

Image:1989 World Series ABC Sports Graphic.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

"Most one sided"

Check the article for the 2004 World Series. The Red Sox only trailed after one inning. That should probably be changed.

Fair use rationale for Image:World Series Logo 1989.png

Image:World Series Logo 1989.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

How is this fact world series related

The bit on the earthquake describes ways in which the World Series mitigated earthquake problems (for instance, traffic on the collapsed freeway was lighter because people had gone home early to watch the game). But then there's this statement:

Although the city's emergency water system failed due to ruptured water mains, volunteers helped connect hoses from San Francisco's fireboat, the Phoenix, to fight fires with pumped salt water from the nearby bay.

What does this have to do with the World Series? --Jfruh (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Jfruh; there are many facts that have seemingly nothing to do with the world series. The purpose of this article should be to inform people on a world series which many people vividly remember due to the earthquake. I would argue that many facts in this article make it a cumbersome read and do not help the article achieve its purpose. A few:

"At the time the earthquake hit, the announcing team for ABC Sports, Tim McCarver, Al Michaels, and Jim Palmer immediately grabbed what they perceived to be the armrests; it turned out that they grabbed each others' thighs, leaving each of them with bruises; recounting this incident years later, Michaels would boldly admit his strong belief that had the earthquake lasted much longer than 15 seconds, he would have been killed"

"By contrast, the broadcasting team in the CBS Radio booth next door, consisting of Jack Buck, Johnny Bench, and John Rooney, ran out as soon as the earthquake started. Bench ran to a spot underneath a steel grate, to which Buck quipped, 'If you would have moved that fast when you played, you wouldn't have hit into so many double plays.' "

"Separately from the broadcast, Peter Gammons and Oakland Athletics pitcher Bob Welch were walking by Marina Middle School in order to get a residency pass when they spotted a slightly unshaven man with a white wind-breaker waiting in line for his pass, who turned out to be Joe DiMaggio, who was concerned over the status of his sister, Louise. Gammons shared this story during a 1999 SportsCenter Flashback special chronicling the 1989 World Series."

"Not long after returning, José Canseco (still in full uniform) and his wife Esther were spotted filling up their car at a self-service gas station. As noted in his later book Juiced, Canseco noted that someone wrote an article portraying him as forcing his wife to pump the gas, but that in reality, she told him to let her do it because if people saw him in his full uniform, it would cause a scene."

I think it's also worth pointing out the poor sentence structure and general wordiness in this article, which I will try to clean up over the next few days. Does anyone agree with me and Jfruh that this extraneous information should be deleted? --DCnative311 (talk) 2:34, July 25, 2011 (CST)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.americansportscollectibles.com/1989worldseriesbaseball.html
  • In 1989 World Series on 2011-05-25 05:48:51, 404 Not Found
  • In 1989 World Series on 2011-06-24 08:13:40, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• 1989ws.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Would there have been an off day between Games 5 and 6?

I am wondering if there would have been an off day between Games 5 and 6 if this World Series went to at least 6 games. I know that if the 2008 World Series went to at least 6 games, there would have not been an off day between Games 5 and 6.

https://web.archive.org/web/20081029181417/http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081028&content_id=3650918&vkey=ps2008news&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.0.38.216 (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

If it had been necessary, Games 5, 6, and 7 would have been on October 29, October 31, and November 1 respectively.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/sports/1989/10/23/game-3-of-world-series-postponed-until-friday/d6c5b36b-5790-46c3-89fc-ee71738dd7b9/ 98.0.38.216 (talk) 01:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Oakland Athletics use of Performance Enhancers

A lot of Oakland players were involved in using performance enhancers at this time. Could someone please provide an accurate account describing this? Thanks. 24.192.24.95 (talk) 00:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)