Talk:1984–1990 Lucky-Goldstar FC seasons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 01:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:YEAR Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reason I didn't just do it as a technical request was because it isn't uncontroversial – they've been moved around in the past couple of months. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 07:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow, you're right! I definitely did not catch that. Now that I'm looking at it, with how much these pages have been moved, I'm shocked there has not been an actual discussion about it until now! Steel1943 (talk) 07:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:YEAR. Steel1943 (talk) 07:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - What would you guys think about moving them to 1984–90 Lucky-Goldstar Hwangso... and 1991–95 LG Cheetahs... respectively? Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Marcus Qwertyus, I'm currently neutral on this, but if that is the route you believe to be better (and better than your original proposal), I have a suggestion/recommendation: I suggest that the original proposal complete first either by its natural course (which would enforce the the original point of changing the title per WP:YEAR), or by withdrawing this proposal to start a new one. The reason I say this is because adding on this request sort of adds an additional change to the request: not only are you proposing for the title to change per WP:YEAR, but now you are also proposing that the possibly-unnecessary disambiguator be removed from/converted into part of the title. That's just my take, mainly because I believe clearer proposals get better results and prevents confusion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Steel1943, I'll make a mental note to come back with that proposal if it isn't decided this time around. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Marcus Qwertyus, understood. By the way, I looked into this a bit further, and I Support this recommended move, given the fact that follows WP:YEAR and gets rid of unnecessary disambiguation in the title. Steel1943 (talk) 21:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Requested move 12 March 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


– This is a requested move to revert a previous move in 2013. Since the last move there has been an RFC and the new consensus is for the second year in a range to include the century see MOS:DATERANGE -- PBS (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.