Talk:1925 Charlevoix–Kamouraska earthquake

Earthquakes Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / History / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, considerable consensus opposing move. —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 8:26pm • 10:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1925 Charlevoix–Kamouraska earthquake → 1925 Charlevoix-Kamouraska earthquake — The title of this earthquake should be hyphenated, not en dashed. All reliable sources I have seen hyphen the name, such as at the Natural Resources Canada website here, here and here. Volcanoguy 09:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose—First page of my google search, and look what came up: 1925 Charlevoix–kamouraska Earthquake: 1925 Charlevoix–kamouraska Earthquake on WN Network delivers the latest Videos and Editable pages for News & Events, including Entertainment, Music, Sports, ...

wn.com/1925_Charlevoix–Kamouraska_earthquake.

It is disruptive to move pages so they breach the MoS guidelines when there are sources out there that it reflects. Tony (talk) 12:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your proof? A search of Charlevoix–Kamouraska earthquake shows like none except for pages related to Wikipedia.[1] You may think it's disruptive, but the current title disrupts me since it is not used in geological sense. And this is not even a reliable source. It looks like they took that title from this article because if you look at the top of that page there is a link about Wikipedia. Volcanoguy 13:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Charlevoix and Kamouraska appear to be two separate regions, and therefore should be en dashed. –CWenger (talk) 03:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I actually found quite a few references to the "Charlevoix–Kamouraska region" or the "Charlevoix–Kamouraska seismic zone", which leads me to think that it is a single region, at least in some contexts, including geology. Dohn joe (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sources have both dashes and hyphens, demonstrating that dashes are correct. No reason to move away from the MOS. — kwami (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This matter needs to be handled centrally, at WT:MOS. WP:MOS most clearly supports the en dash. But there is current discussion at WT:MOS that affects thousands of articles with hyphens or dashes. To grind through all this article by far-flung article is ridiculously inefficient.–_⊥^{¡ɐɔıʇǝo}Noetica!^T– 12:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:COMMONNAME. (It seems to be the name of a seismic region). All RS use a hyphen: Encyclopedia of disasters "Charlevoix-Kamouraska area" [2], Proceedings of the ninth Thematic Conference on Geologic Remote Sensing [3]. Atlantic geology, Volume 27 [4], Current research: Recherches en cours, partie E.Geological Survey of Canada [5], Cambridge University Press[6]. Opposers have not shown any RS that uses a dash. --Enric Naval (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.