Talk:1901 diphtheria antitoxin contamination incident

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 10 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Jim (horse) to 1901 diphtheria antitoxin contamination incident. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 10 January 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 03:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jim (horse) → 1901 diphtheria antitoxin contamination incident – The real occurrence of historical significance here is the scandal involving the contamination of the diphtheria supply with tetanus, which led to substantial reforms in pharmaceutical oversight. The horse itself is an interesting footnote in this story, but is really not the story. Move and rewrite the lede to make this about the incident, with the lede sentence on the horse moved to a section. BD2412 T 03:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support well spotted In ictu oculi (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and In ictu oculi. Entries under Category:Individual male horses tend to indicate racehorses or entertainment industry stars. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:BIO1E. It's the incident that's notable, not the horse. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The horse, of course, will continue to be a redirect. BD2412 T 03:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per proposal Red Slash 23:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very apparent that is the main relevant topic here.MartinezMD (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.