Talk:1883 Korean special mission to the United States/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Godtres (talk · contribs) 10:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Follows the rules on the lead. Godtres (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Obeys the layout guidelines. Godtres (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Obeys words to watch. Godtres (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not on fiction. Godtres (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The style guideline is strongly for prose over embedded lists, but I think the list of members of the mission is ok. Godtres (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- Spot check of sources 1: I've looked at the four instances of citation 75. The second and third use of this citation are spot on. The first and fourth usages have incorrect page numbers (should be p.109 and p.111 respectively), although the source does verify the claims. Godtres (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Spot check of sources 2: I've looked at the two instances of citation 5. This supports both claims (with correct page references). Godtres (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- Is it neutral?
- Is it stable?
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Thank you very much for the review 🙂 All the best! toobigtokale (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)