Talk:180 Degree Capital

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Removed db-corp[edit]

I removed this for a couple reasons. The first is that after doing a GNEWS search I found several reliable sources for this company. A few of them I question whether they are press releases, but I am fairly sure many of them arn't. The key, though, to the removal is that WP:CORP says "There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE, NASDAQ and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable." Harris & Harris Group is traded on the Nasdaq as "TINY".--v/r - T P 13:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You seem somehow to have overlooked the next sentence, which is "Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case." JamesBWatson (talk) 13:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Always WP:GNG to go back on, I did add several refs. That said, I think a publicly traded company is an "assertion of significance" to avoid an CSD A7.--v/r - T P 14:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]