Talk:Ålgård Line/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two disambiguations fixed.diff

Linkrot: no dead links found.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The prose is "reasonably well written", I made a small number of copy-edits.diff Complies sufficiently with the MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Online sources check out, I assume good faith for print sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough, whilst remaining focussed on the subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Correctly tagged and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I have no hesitation in passing this as a good article. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian. Arsenikk (talk) 20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]