Ed Howard (lawyer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ed Howard
Born
Edward Paxson Howard IV

September 21, 1963 (1963-09-21) (age 60)
Alma materGeorge Washington University
Loyola Law School
Occupation(s)Senior Counsel for Children's Advocacy Institute,
Senior Counsel for Center for Public Interest Law,
Principal and Founder of Howard Advocacy
Years active1991-present
Organization(s)Children's Advocacy Institute,
Center for Public Interest Law

Ed Howard (born September 21, 1963) is an American public interest lawyer and strategist who currently works as senior counsel for the Children's Advocacy Institute and the Center for Public Interest Law based at the University of San Diego School of Law. He is also president of Howard Advocacy in Sacramento, California.

Early life and education[edit]

Edward Paxson Howard IV was born in Santa Monica, California and raised in Los Angeles. He graduated from Taft High School in 1981.[1] Howard received his B.A in Political Science from George Washington University in 1986. At George Washington University, Howard was editor-in-chief of the yearbook, Cherry Tree,[2] state chairman of College Democrats for Washington DC, editorials editor for the George Washington University student newspaper The Hatchet, and editor-in-chief of the George Washington University arts and literary magazine Wooden Teeth. He served as the Vice President of the George Washington University College Democrats and as a student senator, where he chaired the Senate Finance Committee. He also founded Political Awareness Week at George Washington University. He received various awards and honors while in college, including the Excellence in Student Life Award, the Outstanding Service to George Washington University award, and was selected for the Omicron Delta Kappa National Leadership Honor Society. Howard received his J.D. from Loyola Law School in 1990, where he was awarded the American Jurisprudence Award for Constitutional Law. He served as Chief Justice of the Moot Court during his time at Loyola Law School.

Legal career[edit]

1991-1995[edit]

During law school at Loyola Law School, Howard interned as a law clerk for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, where he conducted approximately fifty preliminary hearings before the Los Angeles County Municipal Court. He then became an Associate of the downtown Los Angeles office of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker (now Paul Hastings LLP), where he worked on First Amendment and insurance coverage issues, including representing the rap group N.W.A.[citation needed]

Howard's career in public interest law began in 1991 when he became an associate for the former Westwood office of Hall & Phillips, later Hall & Associates. Howard's achievements while at Hall & Associates included serving as the lead counsel on behalf of consumer groups in two California Supreme Court cases of first impression: Amwest v. Wilson (fully implementing Proposition 103, a 1988 insurance reform measure) [3] and 20th Century Garamendi (1994) (unanimously affirming lawfulness of Garamendi's complex premium rebate regulations resulting in over $1 billion in refunds ).[4] Howard's other work while at the firm includes fighting for various environmental issues and sex equity in education.[5] While at Hall & Associates, Howard also served on the Drafting Committees for Proposition 186, an initiative that proposed to establish a state single-payer health care program. Though defeated, the initiative modeled the program's feasibility and was the largest grassroots political campaign fundraising effort in California history.[6]

1995–1999[edit]

From 1995 to 1998, Howard served as the executive director and lead staff attorney for the now-dissolved Center for Law in the Public Interest. While there, he worked on such cases as: Gregorio T. v. Wilson (1994) (successfully challenging anti-immigrant Proposition 187, lead on administrative and initiative law issues);[7] Wenger v. Trans Union (1995) (landmark challenge to credit reporting agency practices);[8] Carmen Doe v. Wilson (1997) (challenging former Governor Pete Wilson's effort to end prenatal care to undocumented women at Christmas time);[9] California Women's Law Center v. State Board of Education (1995) (successfully overturning Board of Education regulations on sexual harassment, leading to the enactment of new regulation);[10] and Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. Quackenbush (1998) (successfully invalidating amendment to Proposition 103).[11] Also, while at the Center for Law in the Public Interest, Howard wrote and spearheaded enactment of AB 156 (Murray), a sweeping reform of credit bureau practices that brought the issue of identity theft to the attention of the nation. Facets of the legislation have been copied in over ten states.[12][13] He also co-wrote AB 50 with the California Bankers Association in 1998, the nation's first bill to regulate biometric identification, by making illegal the sale of voice, fingerprint and retina databases to third parties. It also prohibited the use of such information in discriminatory practices.[14] His experience as a lead counsel for California Supreme Court and appellate cases in initiative matters led the 15th Dean of Loyola Law School to ask Howard to serve as the adjunct professor of law from 1994 to 1998, where he created and taught California's first class devoted to Initiative Law.[15] During his time at CLIPI, Howard served as an adviser on auto insurance, health care reform and personal privacy issues for former 1998 gubernatorial candidate Al Checchi.[16]

"In art you can only alter a facsimile of reality. In policy, or law, you can be directly creative and alter the way people live their lives. You can change the world you live in."

— Ed Howard, [5]

Howard worked as the senior counsel for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights from 1999 to 2000, where he helped engineer the nation's first major class-action managed care reform lawsuits: a nationwide RICO class action against Aetna-U.S Healthcare [17] and a statewide California class action against Kaiser Permanente[18] for false advertising. In 1999 Howard became a partner at Kornarens and Howard, a litigation firm specializing in consumer rights, land use, health care, copyright and trademark litigation, civil rights, writ, law and motion, and appellate practice.[19]

2000–2005[edit]

While at Kornarens and Howard, Howard drafted an initiative that helped victims of identity theft.

He also represented the Bolsa Chica Land Trust before the California Coastal Commission, responsible for crafting the legal theories, grassroots advocacy, and submissions that lead to the Commission in 2000 unanimously preserving not just ribbons of land around wetlands but large tracts of adjacent land.[20] The Commission was subsequently sued by Signal Landmark and Hearthside Homes, Inc. and Howard represented the Land Trust in that case, which turned aside the developer's challenge.[21]

In 2000, Howard became the Chief Policy Consultant & Special Counsel to State Senator Liz Figueroa.[22] Ed had wide-ranging duties that included speech writing and developing, drafting, lobbying, and negotiating the Senator's legislative agenda, especially in the areas of health care, health insurance, property-casualty insurance, labor, Workers’ Compensation, consumer rights, and privacy. He drafted and staffed AB 32 (2000) (a bill jointly authored with Republican Assembly member Keith Richman to reform and expand Medi-Cal and Healthy Families and insure thousands more California children), SB 771 (2001) (establishing a state-maintained "Do Not Call" list that bars telemarketers from calling anyone on the list; jointly authored by Republican Assembly member John Campbell; now copied federally by the FTC);[23] and SB 1950 (2002) (broad reform of Medical Board's doctor disciplinary practices).[24]

In 2005, Howard became the Chief Consultant of Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions and Consumer Protection.[25] As Chief Consultant, Howard spearheaded the investigation and review of all the state's boards and commissions. Howard successfully staffed SB 231 (Figueroa), a landmark reform of Medical Board operations.[26] In the same year Howard was named the Chief Consultant of the Senate's Government Modernization, Efficiency & Accountability Committee. Howard's duties included working on bill analyses and legislative reform proposals. Howard's staff work include SB 577 (2005) (reforming government finance regulation);[27] SB 796 (2005) (requiring Internet access to government information);[28] and SB 954 (reforming information technology procurement).[29]

2006–present[edit]

In January 2007, Howard became senior counsel for the Children's Advocacy Institute based in the University of San Diego School of Law.[30] In 2007 Howard oversaw the Children's Advocacy Institute's and Morrison & Foerster's precedent-setting federal lawsuit on behalf of foster parent advocacy groups (California State Foster Care Association, California State Care Providers Association, and Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting). The purpose of the suit was to seek more money for parents caring for abused and neglected foster children.[31] After three and a half years of litigation, in 2011, the US District Court in San Francisco ordered the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to "immediately" implement new, higher reimbursement rates for California foster parents.[32] While at the Children's Advocacy Institute, Howard has worked on enacting a statute increasing transparency of foster care operations and numerous laws aiding homeless and foster youth. Among these laws is SB 39 (2007) [33] which allows the press and public greater access to county documents when children under the supervision of CPS die. This law has prompted broad press coverage of the operational shortcomings in county child welfare services, especially in Los Angeles and Sacramento Counties.[34]

Howard was part of the legal team that persuaded a judge to strike down regulations promulgated by the State Department of Social Services pursuant to SB 39 that had previously blocked information from being released to the press and public when local child welfare agencies had failed to act to prevent a child from being fatally abused or neglected.[35] Other laws Howard has worked on through the Children's Advocacy Institute include the law that permits more than two parents to be legally recognized as parents[36] and AB 2632 (Maienschein) (2014) that requires criminal record clearances in community care facilities.[37]

When our government uses its blunt power to come into a home and remove children from their parents, you and I assume a terrific moral and spiritual responsibility to do right by these children; a responsibility to do better than the parents we took them from.

— Ed Howard, [38]

In 2007 Howard also became the Senior Counsel for the Center for Public Interest Law, a nonprofit, nonpartisan academic and advocacy organization also based in the University of San Diego School of Law that studies occupational licensing and monitors California agencies that regulate businesses, trades, and professions. Howard's work with the Center for Public Interest Law includes enactment of reforms dealing with the accountancy profession,[39] reform of the regulation of for-profit postsecondary education businesses,[40] SB 658 (2011) (the nation's first law regulating funeral website pricing),[41] and reforming the State Bar of California.[42] Howard was responsible for the press stories exposing that former UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi had accepted a post on Devry University's board of directors.[43]

Ed's legislative work establishing pricing transparency in the funeral home industry was profiled in a national NPR story.[44] He and the work of his colleagues at the Center for Public Interest Law were recently featured in the University of San Diego Law School magazine.[45] Ed was also an advocate for securing millions in public funds to reduce the case loads of attorneys representing foster children.[46] He also successfully sought reformation of how the State Bar oversees lawyers.[47]

Ed was asked by the National Center for Lesbian Rights to offer advice on strategies to defeat Proposition 8 banning gay marriage in Strauss v. Horton (2009) 46 Cal.4th 364 and to file an amicus curiae brief.[48] Ed again worked with the center on behalf of the Children's Advocacy Institute to enact legislation permitting a judge to find more than two adults satisfy the legal test for being a parent if in the child's best interests.[49]

Notable Howard Advocacy clients[edit]

  • American Electronics Association
  • Deposition Reporters Association of California [50]
  • Earthjustice (defeating an end-of-session legislative gambit by Chevron)
  • American Environmental Safety Institute based in Palo Alto, Columbia
  • Columbia Forest Products (a green building company) in a regulatory effort before the Air Resources Board to regulate formaldehyde in composite word products, an effort that has inspired federal regulations [51]
  • Propel Industries (green fuel company)
  • Pride Industries (nation's largest job placement non-profit for the disabled)
  • California Clean Money Action Fund
  • UFCW
  • SEIU-UHW
  • Working Partnerships USA
  • Center for Public Interest Law
  • Common Cause[52]
  • Children's Advocacy Institute
  • CAPA

References[edit]

  1. ^ "We Have Been Told". United Teachers Los Angeles. No. 3. 20 September 1981. Ed Howard Student Taft High School
  2. ^ "Class of 1986 Cherry Tree" (PDF). gwu.edu. George Washington University. 1986. p. 6. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  3. ^ Amwest Surety Ins. Co. v. Wilson, 11 P.2d 906 (Cal. 4th 14 December 1995) ("Edward P. Howard and Gus T. May for Intervener and Appellant").
  4. ^ 20th Century Ins. Co. v. Garamendi, 4 P.2d 566 (Cal. 4th 18 August 1994) ("Edward P. Howard and Leon Dayan for Intervener and Appellant.").
  5. ^ a b Koenenn, Connie (17 February 1995). "The Goods: In the Public's Interest : Lawyer Ed Howard won't cede the battle to reform the state's insurance industry through Prop. 103. Nor will he stop tackling other issues that affect consumers' lives". Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 9 July 2016. It's been only five years since he graduated from Loyola Law School, but Howard, at 31, is deep into the legal trenches of "making a difference."
  6. ^ Farey, K; Lingappa, VR (1996). "California's Proposition 186: lessons from a single-payer health care reform ballot initiative campaign". Journal of Public Health Policy. 17 (2): 133–52. doi:10.2307/3342694. JSTOR 3342694. PMID 8764388. S2CID 37502281.
  7. ^ "Key Impact Cases - Challenging Unconstitutional Laws". advancingjustice-la.org. Asian Americans Advancing Justice Los Angeles. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  8. ^ Lesley Wenger v. Trans Union Corp, 95-6445 (C.D.Cal. 14 November 1995).
  9. ^ Carmen Doe v. Wilson, 57 296 (Cal. App. 4th =25 August 1997) ("Edward P. Howard, Center for Law in the Public Interest, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents Carmen Doe et al. Richard P. Fajardo").
  10. ^ Hall, Carlyle (August 1997). "CLIPI's 30 Most Important Cases" (PDF). www.cityprojectca.org. Center for Law In the Public Interest. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  11. ^ Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. Quackenbush, 64 2d 113 (Cal. App. 4th 24 June 1998) ("Edward P. Howard, Gus T. May and Laura N. Diamond for Plaintiff and Appellant.").
  12. ^ "Bill Analysis". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Info California. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  13. ^ Reich, Kevin (16 April 1998). "Identity Theft Keeps Haunting Its Victims". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 9 July 2016. Ed Howard of the Center for Law in the Public Interest wrote the law with the help of Thomas A. Papageorge, head of the L.A. County District Attorney's Consumer Protection Division. Assemblyman Kevin Murray (D-Los Angeles) carried the measure, and Murray aide Stacy Dwelley worked to placate various lobbies and secure approval.
  14. ^ Stroh, Michael (1 June 1998). "Computer ID Gets Personal". Sacramento Bee. Retrieved 9 July 2016 – via Prophetzine. Once stock props for James Bond flicks, the technology to identify people by the pits and freckles of the iris, the whorl and arch of the fingerprint, or the timbre of their voice -- a technology known as "biometrics" -- is not just possible, "it's here," said Ed Howard, executive director of the Center for Law in the Public Interest in Los Angeles.
  15. ^ Manheim, Karl; Howard, Edward (1 June 1998). "A Structural Theory of the Initiative Power in California". Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 31 (4): 1165. Retrieved 9 July 2016. Edward P. Howard ** Adjunct Professor, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles; Executive Director, Center for Law in the Public Interest.
  16. ^ Sanders, Edmund (12 November 1999). "Sale of Financial Data Starts a Backlash". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2016. the gubernatorial bids of former Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi and businessman Al Checchi. Helping to draft the initiative is Ed Howard, formerly an attorney with the Center for Law in the Public Interest.
  17. ^ Stark, Karl (20 April 1999). "Insurer Is Sued Over Ads For Hmo Aetna U.s. Healthcare Says It Cares For Clients' Health. A California Group Says The Company Cares For Profit". The Philadelphia Inquirer. Interstate General Media L.L.C. Retrieved 9 July 2016. In crucial areas, what Aetna's all about is making money," said Ed Howard, senior counsel for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a nonprofit advocacy group in Santa Monica, Calif. "Aetna has embarked upon a campaign to eliminate the ability of doctors to have any kind of meaningful say in how medical care is provided.
  18. ^ Court, Jamie (16 March 1999). "Kaiser Sued For Fraud Over Mass-Market Advertising; Consumer Group Seeks To Take T.V. Advertisements Off Air". Consumer Watchdog. Retrieved 9 July 2016. According to this lawsuit, Kaiser believes that it can't both get patients and tell the full truth about how it treats those patients," said Ed Howard, lead attorney on the case for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "This chasm between what HMOs advertise and what they actually do is a confession that their true practices can't stand up to public scrutiny.
  19. ^ Imberi, Wayne (4 April 2000). "Re: Your Request for Advice". Letter to Ed Howard. Archived from the original on 20 August 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  20. ^ "Saving the Bolsa Chica Timeline". amigosdebolsachica.org. Amigos de Bolsa Chica. 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  21. ^ Signal Landmark v. Coastal Commission (San Diego County Ct. 14 February 2003) ("Under the facts of this case Signal's writ must be denied."), Text.
  22. ^ "Bill Analysis". leginfo.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  23. ^ "Bill Analysis". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 21 August 2001. Retrieved 10 July 2016. Consultant:Ed Howard
  24. ^ "Bill Analysis". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 20 May 2002. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  25. ^ Fellmeth, Julianne; Papageorge, Thomas (1 November 2005). Final report Medical Board of California Enforcement Program Monitor (PDF) (Report). The Medical Board of California. p. iii. Retrieved 9 July 2016. Special thanks were earned by Joint Committee Chief Consultant Ed Howard, who spearheaded the negotiation of SB 231
  26. ^ "Senate Bill No. 231" (PDF). leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 7 October 2005. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  27. ^ "Bill Number: SB 577 Amended". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 18 February 2005. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  28. ^ "Bill Number: SB 796 Chaptered". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 22 February 2005. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  29. ^ "Bill Number: SB 954 Enrolled". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 22 February 2005. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  30. ^ "Ed Howard". caichildlaw.org. CAI. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  31. ^ "CAI Litigation". Children's Advocacy Institute. 3 October 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  32. ^ Deihl, Regina (2011). "Federal Court Mandates Raise in Foster Care Maintenance Rates". National Center for Youth Law. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  33. ^ Carlson, Cheri (1 October 2010). "6 kids died of abuse, neglect since '08". Ventura County Star. Retrieved 10 July 2016. The purpose of disclosing the information "is to prevent future children from dying, if it's possible to do so," said Ed Howard, a senior attorney with the Children's Advocacy Institute who helped write the bill.
  34. ^ Therolf, Garrett (20 May 2016). "Lawmakers block effort to make child death records secret". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  35. ^ Penney, Raymond (24 June 2013). "Victory for Children in Senate Bill 39 Litigation". University of San Diego School of Law. Retrieved 11 July 2016. Ed Howard, legislative advocate for the Children's Advocacy Institute, remarked that "it is understandable that social workers
  36. ^ Shams, Sharokina (24 May 2016). "CA lawmakers reject proposal to keep near-deaths of kids secret". KCRA 3. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  37. ^ Oliver, Kevin (21 August 2014). "Bill will require background checks for day care workers". KCRA 3. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  38. ^ Howard, Edward. "Viewpoints: Shame on us for putting foster kids last". Sacramento Bee. Cheryl Dell. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  39. ^ Fellmeth, Julianne (12 November 2007). "Memo to: Members of the California Board of Accountancy" (PDF). cpil.org. Center for Public Interest Law. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  40. ^ "Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes" (PDF). bppe.ca.gov. Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education. 12 November 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2016. Ed Howard, Legal Counsel, University of San Diego School of Law's Center for Public Interest Law, emphasized the value of reaching out to stakeholders during the rulemaking process.
  41. ^ "Bill Analysis". leginfo.ca.gov. Legislative Information California. 4 April 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  42. ^ Li, Victor (3 June 2016). "California Assembly passes bill requiring state bar to reliquish [sic] control of its board to nonlawyers". ABA Journal. Retrieved 11 July 2016. This is the minimum necessary for what might work as opposed to what we know will work," said Ed Howard, senior counsel for the Center for Public Interest Law, which was in favor of de-unification. "If this is the starting place of the conversation about real reform, this is a good day.
  43. ^ Lambert, Diana (1 March 2016). "UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi quite Devry Board Under Pressure". The Sacramento Bee. Retrieved 11 July 2016. It is an epic lapse of judgment for the chancellor to let a corporation that is currently being sued by the Federal Trade Commission for deceiving students to exploit the good name of the University of California," said Ed Howard, senior counsel for the Center for Public Interest Law, before Katehi announced her resignation.
  44. ^ "Despite Decades-Old Law, Funeral Prices Are Still Unclear". NPR.org. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
  45. ^ "Power to the Public – Advocate Online". www.sandiego.edu. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
  46. ^ "'We're Abandoning These Kids to a Government Bureaucracy' - Voice of San Diego". Voice of San Diego. 2017-06-08. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
  47. ^ "Audit: State Bar Failed to Protect Public From Some Bad Lawyers". NBC Bay Area. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
  48. ^ "Strauss v. Horton - 46 Cal.4th 364 S168047M - Wed, 06/17/2009 | California Supreme Court Resources". scocal.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2018-01-09.
  49. ^ "Governor Signs Bill Protecting Children Who Have More Than Two Legal Parents". National Center for Lesbian Rights. 2013-10-04. Retrieved 2018-01-09.
  50. ^ "Brief of Amicus Curiae, Deposition Reporters Association of California in Support of Complaint for Declaratory Relief of Plaintiff Court Reporters Board of California" (PDF). caldra.org. California Deposition Reporters Association. 17 January 2012. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  51. ^ Editors, HF (7 December 2015). "EPA Pushes Back Final Engineered Floors Formaldehyde Rule Until May". Hardwood Floors Magazine. National Wood Flooring Association. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 11 July 2016. {{cite news}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  52. ^ "California Secretary of State - CalAccess - Lobbying Activity".