Draft:Aristotlean idea to Actus Purus

Submission declined on 1 June 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by KylieTastic 2 days ago. Last edited by KylieTastic 2 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 6 February 2024 by Sungodtemple (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by Sungodtemple 3 months ago.

Comment: Still unsourced KylieTastic (talk) 13:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

In Aristotelian philosophy, the concept of Actus Purus is associated with the idea of the "unmoved mover." According to Aristotle, everything in the universe is in motion, but this motion must have a cause. Let's delve into this fascinating concept: Actus Purus (Pure Actuality): Actus Purus (or Pure Act) represents the absolute perfection of Yahweh in scholastic philosophy. Created beings possess both potentiality (what they can become) and actuality (what they currently are). They have imperfections alongside their perfections. However, only Yahweh is simultaneously infinitely real and infinitely perfect. In the Christian Bible's Exodus 3:14, Yahweh says "I am who I am." to Moses to identify himself to him in the burning bush. Yahweh's attributes and operations are identical with His essence, and His essence necessitates His existence. Unlike created beings, Yahweh is pure act—all that He can be, infinitely realized and perfect. Unmoved Mover: Aristotle used the concept of the "unmoved mover" to explain the existence of the universe. According to him, everything in the cosmos is in motion, but this motion requires a cause. The unmoved mover is the prime mover, initiating all motion without being moved itself. In this context, Actus Purus aligns with the idea of the unchanging, eternal, and perfect Being—Yahweh—who sets everything in motion. Common Being vs. Intensive Being: Thomas Aquinas further elaborated on Actus Purus: Common Being: Refers to the weak sense or common existence shared by all created entities. It is universal and indeterminate. Intensive Being: Also known as being in the strong sense, it is the highest real perfection. It includes every possible determination and excludes any other addition. Yahweh embodies intensive Being, while everything else partakes in common being. In summary, Actus Purus encapsulates the divine perfection, unchanging nature, and eternal existence of Yahweh—the ultimate unmoved mover who sets the universe in motion.