This category is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this category, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
This doesn't seem like an appropriate category to put individual people into. It is not a defining characteristic of those individuals, and it's incredibly subjective whether Person Z is sufficiently gender-nonconforming to be in the category. I mean, how many times does a man need to wear a dress to qualify? Are high heels enough? What if he's just really "girly"? I can think of dozens of notable people over the years who are nonconforming in one way or another, but it may or may not be something important to them, or may not fit their own self-identity. Additionally, it's now being treated as both a topic category (articles about nonconformity) and a set category (articles about people who are nonconforming)... making it a mix of apples and oranges. That's not a good approach to categorization. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are several high-profile non-LGBT people like Rudy Giuliani, Dennis Rodman, Kid Cudi, Young Thug, Jermaine Fowler, and Harry Styles who should be included if we keep this category.--14Jenna7Caesura (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
