Category talk:Jewish anarchists

Judaism Category‑class

	Judaism portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Jewish history Category‑class

	Judaism portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Category needs criteria[edit]

Needs to state category criteria. --FloNight 11:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete category?[edit]

Category:Jewish libertarians recently was deleted. For most of the same reasons Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_20#Category:Jewish_libertarians|as this discussion]] shouldn't this category be deleted? CarolMooreDC (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are anarcho-capitalists anarchists?[edit]

Aas far as I'm aware, anarcho-capitalists are usually not considered anarchists, as anarchism is (broadly) defined as an "opposition to hierarchies", while capitalism is itself a hierarchy (of employer/owning class over employee/working class). Therefore, we should probably remove anarcho-capitalists such as Murray Rothbard and David D. Friedman from the category. Even by Rothbard's own estimation, "anarcho"-capitalists are not anarchists in the historical sense of the term:

We must conclude that the question "are libertarians anarchists?" simply cannot be answered on etymological grounds. The vagueness of the term itself is such that the libertarian system would be considered anarchist by some people and archist by others. We must therefore turn to history for enlightenment; here we find that none of the proclaimed anarchist groups correspond to the libertarian position, that even the best of them have unrealistic and socialistic elements in their doctrines. Furthermore, we find that all of the current anarchists are irrational collectivists, and therefore at opposite poles from our position. We must therefore conclude that we are not anarchists, and that those who call us anarchists are not on firm etymological ground, and are being completely unhistorical.

from the bottom of this page

--

That's a topic of debate, see our article Anarchism and capitalism. It's even contentious if anarcho-capitalism is a form of capitalism or not. Best to follow the most broadest definition and include all colors and fashions of anarchism. --Distelfinck (talk) 22:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]