Category talk:DC Comics titles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconComics: DC Comics Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This category is supported by DC Comics work group.

Listings on Minor Titles[edit]

I realize that no one has asked for this input, and acknowledge that up front. However, it seems to me that if anyone coming to this page, or any of the similar pages about characters, creators, titles, etc., of other publishers, sees that their own favorite title is either not listed or does not have a page alreaady, that there is a very good chance that they will create one, and perhaps subsequently cause some measure of disagreement about whether or not it qualifies as "significant." On that basis, I would suggest that should there be any titles, characters, creators, whatever, which are found to not have sufficient "significance" to qualify for a separate page, that the skeleton data on that subject be included on the main page or a separate page on minor charcters, creators, titles, whatever, probably along with an indication that it has already been determined to not merit its own page. The Bibliography of Batman Titles page already has several entries in it which do this. After all, we can never tell when a creator decides to turn a character who had been a virtual nonentity, like Black Orchid, into a character with their own title. Also, clearly for minor groups which do not qualify as "significant", a slightly longer skeleton entry, listing the title and creator information as well as possibly one or two clause entries on the individual members, might well be sufficient information for any potential future enquiries. Thank you for having read this statement.Badbilltucker 15:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]