Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pule (Holiday)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 16:50, November 7, 2007.
Pule (Holiday)[edit]
I'm self-nominating this article for featured article because I believe it is one of the best examples of Wikipedia's work. The quality of the page's writing would very much do Wikipedia justice. Also, I believe that Wikipedia should stand behind its otherwise ignored (yet well-written) articles, show that we care about all content, whether it's a major world event, a famous inventor, or a fictional holiday. Go to my user page if you want to see the lost information on the holiday of Pule! 21:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, gotta oppose this one! No references at all. And would need some serious copy-editing too! Sounds like you had fun writing it though... :) MeegsC | Talk 22:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Good work so far. It just might survive deletion. Epbr123 22:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Supporting this. It looks well-written, especially when compared to way back when the first Pule article was written. It's come a long way, and I just think it's fabulous. Deck the Hallz 22:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Deck the Hallz (talk · contribs · logs) blocked indefinitely per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Feats-O-Strength. -- Jreferee t/c 21:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose and suggest withdrawal. No references, many stylistic errors, notability has been question, and quite brief for a FA. The JPStalk to me 00:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But length isn't part of the criteria. Go to my user page if you want to see the lost information on the holiday of Pule! 00:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy remove, can't be serious.--Grahamec 01:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose this article is a pule of crap --Cloveious 02:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are kidding, right? I AM serious, and this article is NOT crap! Explain to me how this article is crap.Go to my user page if you want to see the lost information on the holiday of Pule! 02:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - this was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pule (2nd nomination), and reposting it is just disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't know WHY it was deleted! And there's not even a deletion nomination thing for that article, just the original article! And "Deck the sock puppet"? What the hell does THAT mean? Go to my user page if you want to see the lost information on the holiday of Pule! 11:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What is wrong with you people?! Don't you know a good article when you SEE ONE?! I'm with Feats-O-Strength on this one here. And a very merry Pule to you too! Deck the Hallz 15:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.