User talk:Winerock

Image copyright problem with Image:James armstrong playwright.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:James armstrong playwright.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:James armstrong playwright.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:James armstrong playwright.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine de' Medici's patronage of the arts[edit]

If you can spare the time, would you be kind enough to look over the "Dance" section in the above article for me? I've done my best to reproduce the key elements of Lee's analysis, but I am out of my ground (which is history and art) with figures, patterns, and the humanistic aspects of the performances, and I'd be glad if you could make sure the details and terms are correct. Many thanks. qp10qp (talk) 15:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing[edit]

Hey there...

I am going through a number of images that have some minor licensing issues. I came across Image:Stanley elkins.jpg which you uploaded. The licensing on this image is not complete as it was uploaded many years ago. I wonder if you could follow the link to the image page and correct the licensing with a GFDL license (or other free license). If you have any questions or issues, please drop me a note on my talk page. Thanks. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Sutton (actress)[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Julia Sutton (actress), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Julia Sutton. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The bot here is correct. If you want to overwrite an existing article with a disambiguation page, move the article to the new title and then replace the redirect with the disambiguation page. Don't just copy and paste the content, that destroys the edit history (which we need to keep for legal reasons). I've fixed the problem here. Hut 8.5 09:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Canario (dance)[edit]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Winerock, thanks for creating Canario (dance)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. In order to prevent possible deletion, please provide sources. For more information please see WP:RS.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

The International Encyclopedia of Dance[edit]

Hello!

As far as I can understand from Canario (dance), you are the owner of an issue of /subj. I am from the russian wikipedia, and I want to write an article about another old-fachioned dance, spagnoletta. For this, I need to use The International Encyclopedia of Dance and an entry about spagnoletta, in particluar. That's why I'm here. Could you please tell me where I can find a free version of that encyclopedia, or some other users who own it, or could you please send me a facsimile of the exact entry about spagnoletta.

Thanks a million, Wanwa (talk) 12:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Studies Association moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Dance Studies Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). As it stands, all provided citations in the article are to sources directly connected with the Dance Studies Association, and thus cannot be considered independent or reliable.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dance Studies Association (November 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dance Studies Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dance Studies Association, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Winerock! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 01:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Winerock. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dance Studies Association[edit]

Hello, Winerock. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dance Studies Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 00:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dance Studies Association concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dance Studies Association, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dance Studies Association[edit]

Hello, Winerock. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dance Studies Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]