User talk:The Stroll

Welcome!

Hello, The Stroll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! David Ruben ^Talk 00:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/Nutriture_hypothesis

Looks good. Do you have a link for CABC's CV? Someone has asked for the citation on it, linked or not. I am a little curious what happened to him that last year. He was listed in the NO phone directory online right before Katrina and, of course everything was chaotic after that (I was going to inquire about a simple DVD version on C vols 1-3). I have since seen adresses for Houston & Pineville/Alexandria (consultant/director of a local hosp unit?).--TheNautilus 09:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CABC is fine, you might want to take a shot at compressing /Nutriture_hypothesis' 3 paragraph form into 2 and redo the references. The current SBS version is of course unreferenced POV and deletable when you are ready.--TheNautilus 09:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to turn on your Wiki email (at least temporarily) to send me an email (through the user "my preferences" menu accessed at the top of the page). You'll need to be sure and check the "enable" boxes to send/receive email. I suspect many people use throw-a-email accounts for privacy.--TheNautilus 00:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI, I am asking you for help. Quackbusters are hijacking the Vitamin C and Vitamin C megadosage pages. Very dishonest practices. I'm exhausted and utterly revolted.

Copy of this message was sent to TheNautilus. Pierre-Alain Gouanvic 07:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leon C. Collins[edit]

The article Leon C. Collins has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war?[edit]

This is in reference to SBS page. I invited you to discuss why you wanted to readd the material previously deleted but instead you just readded it. It was removed because it is duplicate information that is addressed in the History section. References were moved to history section to improve the article. I would be interested to know why you think the info should be were you inserted it. I will await your reply before taking up the issue with a senior editor. Also I see you removed a reference and changed the date in the history section. Without a reference this is puzzling. Title is meant as it reads,it's a question. Daffydavid (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Slip Form Concrete[edit]

I undid you recent edits about the LA pour for 20 hours on the slip forming page. There was no indication that is a slip form concrete job. If you feel that this is in error can you can change it back but please provide a source that this uses slip forming. Thanks XFEM Skier (talk) 01:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to start a discussion of this on the talk page for slip forming. XFEM Skier (talk) 05:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also undid the change until consensus is reached for this. XFEM Skier (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, The Stroll. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, The Stroll. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dean Burk 1954.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dean Burk 1954.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:24, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Otto H. Warburg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Otto H. Warburg.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:04, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Otto H. Warburg.jpg[edit]

The file File:Otto H. Warburg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]