User talk:Elysiumgate

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Instone.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 13:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Instone concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Instone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Instone[edit]

Hello Elysiumgate. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Samuel Instone".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Instone}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Elysiumgate/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Elysiumgate. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 10:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Andrew Hallam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Andrew Hallam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Hallam (December 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Hallam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew Hallam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 15:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elysiumgate! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 15:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Hallam (December 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Hallam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew Hallam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Hallam has been accepted[edit]

Andrew Hallam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid-editor disclosure[edit]

Hi! Your edit history strongly suggests that you have some connection to AES International and/or to people connected to it such as Samuel Instone and Andrew Hallam – you have not made a single edit outside those topics. Our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. If you are receiving, or expect to receive, monetary or other benefits or considerations from editing Wikipedia as a representative of an organization (as an employee or contractor; as an employee or contractor of a firm hired by that organization for public-relations purposes; as owner, officer or other stakeholder; or by having some other form of close financial relationship with a topic you wish to write about), then you must disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Elysiumgate. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Elysiumgate|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please say so, here on this page. Otherwise, please make the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you have answered this message. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No paid editing[edit]

In no way have we been paid directly or indirectly for this page. Andrew is a friend and asked for help on how to write his first Wiki page. In this way we helped, but absolutely no financial gain has been made or will be. Can all the warnings please be removed? --Elysiumgate (talk) 13:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you missed the part where the warning also included WP:COI. Please read that. Praxidicae (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we", Elysiumgate? Is there more than one of you, or is that a corporate "we"? Please answer this: do you have or have you ever had a connection to AES International? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae (talk). I'm happy to answer all your questions and have nothing to hide. Elysiumgate is a very old account I believe, and yes we are the owner of AES International. Sam Instone is the CEO. Andrew Hallam asked us for help setting up his Wiki and to be honest, we found it very confusing and simply tried to assist as he is a friend of our CEO. It was not in return for anything, or anything to do with former pages we have tried to set up before for AES and Sam. It was not intended to hide any connections or mislead in any way. I see the article has now been totally stripped back. Is it now acceptable? If we didn't disclose any kind of connection it was a genuine mistake. I hadn't realised the connection to AES was important and am still not sure I know why it is. Thanks for your guidance so far. --Elysiumgate (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Andrew Hallam, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Elysiumgate, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Elysiumgate|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. It does not matter if the financial stake is direct or indirect. It needs to be disclosed before any further edits. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sulfurboy. I am very new to this. So I can confirm that we are not being paid directly or indirectly for our edits. We were simply helping out. I have not made any edits since this query began. Is this the disclosure you need or is there somewhere else I should post it? I appreciate your help! --Elysiumgate (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elysiumgate several editors have been through this multiple times with you here and on other talk pages. You have a direct and inherent conflict of interest and you must disclose it. Further, who is the we you continue to refer to? Praxidicae (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]