This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CryOCed.
The insanity of this user is confirmed. There. You don't believe me? Well, look at the rest of the page...
M name is Cedrick, In real life, I tend to be much more sophisticated through my edits, and I am still learning on how to be a good Wikipedian. If you have any tips on me, post them at my talk page, suggestions are highly appreciated . I am extremely kind when it comes to newcomers, and if you want help, why not stop by over my talk page? ~CedricK(Talk to me!) 00:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
For your perseverance despite a few initial bumps and your incredible willingness to learn. Welcome to Wikipedia! --Bananasoldier (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Based on your response at the Teahouse, I'm sure you'll do just fine, especially if you don't follow my example. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
One of the most common methods used by WikiProject contributors to monitor and prioritize their work is that of assessing the articles within their scope. The de facto standard for these assessments is the Version 1.0 Editorial Team'sassessment scale (shown below).
– The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
– The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.