Talk:William Bunge

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Could be linked to the "bunge" redirection page (other people whose surname is Bunge appear in it) - DONE

Why are you proposing Deleting this entry? For example I am writing a paper on William Bunge right now and this entry was an invaluable resource to get started. This is a well written entry on William Bunge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.74.236.153 (talk) 03:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My main reasons are that its only sourcs are the author's own publications, that its writing style seems to suggest it is original research by someone close to the author, and most of it is reviews of writings of the subject. Mbisanz (talk) 06:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the prod tag because a Google Scholar search and Google Book search indicate likely notability. I think this at least deserves discussion at AfD before a decision is made on deletion. Of course it still needs major cleanup. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Death ?[edit]

I have removed the date of death as I can't find an obituary. --Racklever (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a source (the only one that seems to exist - there's no obituary). --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]