Talk:Tapada limeña

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peru

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Contested G5?[edit]

@Why? I Ask Did you mean to contest the G5, or was it an edit conflict? You only mentioned adding a source in your edit summary, but also removed the G5 tag, so I don't know what you meant to do there. Given Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Vvven, if you do intend to fix it, you'll have to check the article for copyright violations. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 17:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I plan to check it over and fix it. Seems like a good enough article, and I have a decent amount of other sources collected covering the topic. Unfortunately, I am away from the computer at the moment, so that will have to wait. I did not see anything clearly copied when running the copyvio detector, but it is possible some of it may have been translated after being copied from somewhere (aside from the credited Spanish Wikipedia). Why? I Ask (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for the clarification, and thank you for planning to fix it! I don't feel great about G5ing a bunch of articles (I have a bunch of them bookmarked to try and fix later, when I have the time), but it takes, on average, about 10-30 minutes to check and clean an article with straightforward vios. If I can save 24 hours labour by doing it, I will. Again, though- this article clearly has a lot of information in it, so thank you for offering to save it. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

update: yep, just an unattributed esWiki translation. I don't know why they didn't use the edit summary box to attribute it, but I've repaired it now. The article is yours! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]