Talk:NSC Nijkerk

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Sb008 (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Same message was send to User:RickinBaltimore

Hi, today you deleted the page ASV Dronten. Two more pages VV Eemdijk and NSC Nijkerk are marked for speedy deletion. A fourth page SDV Barneveld was marked for speedy deletion as well, but is back in "normal" state. There is a reference to these pages on 2016–17 Hoofdklasse. They were tagged by User:Jone Rohne Nester.
I like to know why? It seems these teams are not notable enough to have a team page. But if a team has to be a professional team, so Eredivisie or Eerste Divisie to be notable, I wonder why out of the non professional 18 Tweede Divisie teams, 2 times 18 Derde Divisie teams and 4 times 16 Hoofdklasse teams, making a total of 118 teams the big majority of them is allowed to have a team page?
I tried to fill a gap by providing a basic team page to the teams without a team page. Why are specifically these 4 teams not allowed to have a team page where most of the other teams are? We prefer an inconsistent situation of most teams having and some teams not having a team page? If these 4 teams are not allowed to have a team page shouldn't the team page of all 118 teams be deleted? Who is going to replace the links for these teams on the league pages into strings? Or even better, if the teams are not notable enough, why would the leagues be and shouldn't the league pages be completely deleted as well?
What ever the answer is, I feel it should be consequent and consistent. So either allow all or delete all.
--Sb008 (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)