Talk:Land Rover Defender (L663)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Land Rover Defender (L663) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Jaguar Land Rover car platforms#D8#D7x|D7x]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Defemder (L663)[edit]

The page was created by DeFacto. Thanks. Copied content from Land Rover Defender; see that page's history for attribution (3,587 bytes).--Max One USA (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Double mention, does it matter[edit]

We mention the future PHEV variant once under Specs and once again under Future Variants. Does it matter? I'm unsure, which is why I have not indulged in a wild orgy of impulsive editing. So if it's fine, it's fine. Thanks and best to all, 82.39.96.55 (talk) 09:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC) PS I want one.[reply]

No need to have it twice, I removed one. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely, thanks very much 82.39.96.55 (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"subjective opinion needs attribution"[edit]

Moved here from my talkpage. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi [DeFacto], I note that you deleted a sentence I wrote, saying "subjective opinion needs attribution".

Fair enough; but please note that in the InfoBox, another editor has declared the L663's predecessors to be "Land Rover Defender (L316)" AND "Land Rover Discovery 4"! Arrivisto (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arrivisto, that needs to be supported by a reliable source. The article doesn't currently support that, so I removed it too. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeFacto, I've no objection to the deletion; I'm just suggesting that the InfoBox edit may also need deletion. Arrivisto (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arrivisto, I agree with you, and have deleted it, as I said above. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal[edit]

I propose that the section about the 2023 crash be split into a separate page. 90.255.6.219 (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that section as it is nothing to do with the subject of this article. Whether that news story is notable enough to be the subject of another article is a matter for discussion elsewhere. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, an article has already been created for that story (see 2023 Wimbledon school crash) and is already the subject of a deletion discussion. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crossover vs SUV (see the entire D7 part of the section in the platform article)[edit]

The Land Rover Defender uses a D7-series platform derived from Jaguar XE and XF/F-Pace also for use in Range Rover vehicles, which happens to be a unibody platform. It may sound difficult to hear, but it is a crossover, even if some trims are off-road-handy. 2600:6C50:4000:27D0:C1DC:1528:31:309D (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, even while we ignore the unibody platform, the Defender still has no direct competitors. The G-Wagen is far too expensive. The Wrangler and Bronco are designed almost exclusively for off-roading, and are mostly utilitarian. The Defender barely rivals the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado or Lexus GX. 2600:6C50:4000:27D0:C1DC:1528:31:309D (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to lead[edit]

Moved from User talk:DeFacto

I noticed you [DeFacto] reverted my edit on this page in the opening of the article under the reasoning of 'I think it was clearer before'. In my opinion, the previous wording, while somewhat punchy in getting a point across, reads as if it came from an advertisement to buy it (for me at least), for example, 'Significant for being the first all-new model' and 'breaking the lineage'. I would prefer the wording I changed it to, since I tried to keep the original point opaque, but obviously I would need your view first (now that you have seen where I am coming from)

Apologies if this is slightly long to read ASmallMapleLeaf (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not convinced. Let's see if anyone else has a view. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]