Talk:Kimberley points

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Australia portal Kimberley points is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

akerman's points[edit]

Akerman Kim and Bindon, Peter. 1995.Dentate and related stone biface points from Northern Australia.

The Beagle. Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory. 12:89-99.

Akerman, Kim., Fullagar, Richard and van Gijn, Annelou. 2002. Weapons and Wunan: production, function and exchange of Kimberley points.Aboriginal Studies 2002/1:13-42.

Akerman, Kim. 2008.‘Missing the Point’ or ‘What to Believe – the Theory or the Data’.

Rationales for the Production of Kimberley Points. Aboriginal Studies 2008/2:70-79. AIATSIS Canberra.