Talk:James J. Martin (historian)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

anarcho-capitalist?[edit]

Are you sure he was an anarcho-capitalist? I see it said that he was an "individualist anarchist" influenced by Tucker. [1] RJII 06:04, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"criticism"/Miller[edit]

I'm not sure why there is a paragraph on Miller's The Crucible. Lots of people have published criticism; was this a major aspect of Martin's career? Otherwise it seems wholly un-notable. Moreover, it's uncited -- where is this criticism? And it's unintelligible -- I can't tell if Martin said that the protagonist was not heroic, and he was not heroic because; or if he said that the protagonist was heroic, but for two reasons. I'm deleting the paragraph from the text and putting it here for someone else to work with. It includes my minor rewrite for clarity in the first half of the paragraph, and my {{cn}} template. Lquilter (talk) 16:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He also published criticism. For instance, of Arthur Miller's The Crucible, Martin said that John Proctor is not heroic merely because he points the finger at himself, but because his story allows him to point out the evil in his environment, the enemy of man's freedom, here the repressive structures of society that would take a man's name.Undercutting his credibility? Maybe just undercutting his popularity in some circles. Can you supply some links as to his holocaust thoughts? He may be a good source - why did he and others think that the holocaust was being used as a cover/deversion for WW2? I hope WW2 wasn't a "preemptive" strike against Germany et al - some preWW2 writings seem to suggest that we ( the Allies) were hunting for a reason - wiki occasionally hits a homer.159.105.80.141 (talk) 19:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James J. Martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]