Talk:Investigative genetic genealogy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Privacy implications- Direct-to-consumer companies[edit]

I tagged "Example Needed" because citation 10 is pay walled. Federal Courts? State Courts? What Courts?Jd4x4 (talk) 05:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images provided for the article I chose. So I will be adding images that are relevant to the article and making sure they fit the guidelines for wikipedia. I’ll try to add an image for each section to provide a visual for visual learners like me, since I tend to remember where I read something on wikipedia based on where images are placed. Deathstar00 (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathstar00 (talkcontribs) 23:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: English 111 First-Semester College Composition[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2023 and 16 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Deathstar00 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TheBigGorilla.

— Assignment last updated by Lincol7 (talk) 13:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is with the race section?[edit]

What is with the claim that the CODUS system is somehow "racially prejudice" seems there is some type of bias in this article witch is no surprise to wikipedia. You forgot to add that 75% of the population is white therefore clearly whites commit more crime in TOTAL. But if you break that down into percentage or ratio and FBI stats prove this. Black males who make up 6% of the population commit almost 52% of the violent crime. White men make up roughly 37% of the population. Also way more white people use DNA family tree websites as opposed to black people. Black people are less likely to utilize these family tree websites. Ancestry even has a demographic breakdown on their wesbite witch shows the racial makeup of its users. It seems whoever edited this is trying to frame this into some type of racial crusade and another daily hit piece of how evil white people are and squeeze in some anti white bias wherever they can. Once i gather some contradicting sources to back up my claims i will gladly edit the article with some counter arguments. Or we can just erase the race section and leave it unbiased like Wikipedia was supposed to be. Panhead 1955 (talk) 03:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]