Jump to content

Talk:Hundersfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know where the external links got their info from, but here is what Youngs has to say on the subject (abbreviations expanded)

"HUNDERSFIELD. Ecclesiastical parish, created 1746 from the ancient parish of Rochdale, seperate ecclesiastal status not sustained. Rochdale Rural Deanery."

That's it. Certainly not an ancient parish, not a civil parish, and certainly not "split up" in 1894: the historical record here is quite well documented and it is known that these townships and chapelries became civil parishes in 1866 anyway. Morwen - Talk 10:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hundersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]