Talk:Herbert Witzenmann

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Contemporary philosophy

Clean-up[edit]

I've tried to remove less important sections and have fact-tagged some material that really needs a source. The article generally needs to quote its sources, as well.

The nav box at the end is interesting; what criteria are used to determine whether someone is a founder of the A.S.? I have removed some people who either don't qualify (if a high bar is set), or if they do (using a low bar), then along with dozens or hundreds of others. This should be discussed further; I have left the Executive Board of the A.S. in 1924. What about the directors of the first A.S. (1913)? hgilbert (talk) 12:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation and hearsay information about who attended what conference years ago really don't belong in the article. Could we begin to find sources for material? hgilbert (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]