Talk:Farmfoods

Retailing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Retailing To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : SM Lanang Premier
Copyedit : Retailing in India
Expand : :- Please expand this project's list of articles. The subcategories of Category:Retailers is also an excellent starting point.
- Expand this project's image gallery page

- More articles for expansion: Automated retail, Big-box store, Chain store, Hypermarket, Store manager
NPOV : Retail loss prevention
Photo : Retail design
Stubs : Leakage (retail), Retail geography
Verify : Department store, Discount store, Retail clerk, Retail in the Republic of Ireland, Retail media, Retail software, Suggested retail price
Other : * Please add this project's banner {{WikiProject Retailing}} to retail-related talk pages. Also, bots can be utilized to automate this task.
- Also, add biographies to the articles list.

–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV[edit]

This is one of the most POV articles I have seen Duke toaster 10:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.

"Farmfoods does not have the "cheap and nasty" perception" - Whether a shop is cheap and nasty is entirely subjective.
"Middle-class people are not ashamed to shop at Farmfoods." - Says who? That is a ridiculous generalisation.
"many regular customers are on first-name terms with the staff members." - I don't see how this is relevant. This can happen anywhere.
"Queues at checkouts tend to be smaller and quicker than at Lidl and Aldi." - Another ridiculous statement as far as I'm concerned. Queue length ultimately depends on the level of retail activity on the store.
"Farmfoods' cater to a wide variety of customers, especially pensioners and families with young children." Bizarre. Why especially these groups? Is it to make the store appealing to them? Although I can understand the root of this statement: Farmfoods specialise in frozen food and people with less time on their hands or who are less able to prepare food due to whatever reasons e.g. time constrictions would probably find ready made/prepared food more convenient.

Though as far as I can see, this article currently stands as an appraisal to make Aldi and Lidl seem inferior. Hardly NPOV! WilliamH 16:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes[edit]

The article has recently changed radically, but is still unreferenced. Fourohfour 18:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Farmfoods Logo.jpg[edit]

Bulky automated bot warning removed, fair use rationale inserted into disputed image. Fourohfour 10:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Farmfoods Logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Farmfoods Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]