This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Why does is this article grouped under "Ponds, pools and puddles" and not physics?? OxygenBlue (talk) 10:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, that's a bit odd. I've removed the {{pond}} template from the bottom of the article. -- The Anome (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree; it may be a non-engish language issue, or the urge to bring whimsy to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.155.194 (talk) 03:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And I have also removed the Pond template from the end of the article.--75.164.155.194 (talk) 03:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unsure how to edit pictures, but I'm sure that the current picture does not show the coffee ring effect, but rather just a coffee stain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.116.190.25 (talk) 09:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen this also refered to as the "coffee stain effect", so I have modified the entry to take this into account. [1]billclawson (talk) 21:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
References
^"Suppressing the coffee stain effect: how to control colloidal self-assembly in
evaporating drops using electrowetting" H. B. Eral,D. Mampallil Augustine,M. H. G. Duits and F. Mugele; Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 4954