Talk:Armageddon (MUD)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (3 participants)
Joshua Tomar (4 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (nom)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (nom)
AirCars (start)
Kenshi (Mortal Kombat) (nom)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Armageddon MUD Fansite[edit]

Discussion regarding inclusion of 'Armageddon MUD Fansite' on page. User Chaos5023 argues that page does not meet criteria due to WP:ELMAYBE #11. Armageddon MUD Fansite is written by a staff member (as expressed in correspondence) and contains criteria that meets WP:ELYES #3 (amount of detail) and WP:ELMAYBE #4 possibly as well.68.80.95.140 (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with Chaos5023 though, I can't see any good reason to add this particular site. Currently the site itself stays it is still under construction and the information it contains is actually rather limited. There cases in which you might argue for adding of a fan site under external links, but this one doesn't seem to be it. Also I find it hard to imagine that this site is the best/most informative fansite/website on the game out there.--Kmhkmh (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Armageddon MUD Discussion Board[edit]

The complaints referenced on the linked Armageddon Discussion Board have been added as a significant counter-point, which I feel is necessary for a Wikipedia article to remain unbiased. The conversations which occur on this shadowboard are provably related to and influential of Armageddon; because of this, I believe that it should be noted on the MUD's wikipedia page. Asanadas (talk) 03:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-added this segment of the wiki page with some wording changes to satisfy the individual who removed it. To that individual, I recommend that they read Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and endeavor to apply the concepts to this page as well. Asanadas (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]