Talk:2012 Goa Legislative Assembly election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hindu/Catholic context[edit]

1. BJP are read in the media and WP as "Hindu nationalist" so the Catholic MLAs (5_) are relevant. 2. The sourced analysis section explicitly mentions the religious aspect of BJP taking the minority vote.(Lihaas (talk) 10:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Links[edit]

>> BJP ropes in Goan Christian MLAs>> BJP to woo Christian votes in Goa [>>http://www.goanews.com/news_disp.php?newsid=1170 >> BJP to lure Christians in Goa ][ >>http://www.ucanindia.in/news/bharatiya-janata-party-fields-five-christian-candidates-in-goa/16795/daily >> Bharatiya Janata Party fields five Christian candidates in Goa]Lihaas (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goa Legislative Assembly election, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]