Talk:Paralititan

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Autochthonous?[edit]

"The autochthonous, scavenged skeleton was preserved ..." -- This is a quote from the original source http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/292/5522/1704 .
What is "autochthonous" supposed to mean in this context? -- 201.19.93.178 17:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First tetrapod since 1935?[edit]

The article states that P. is the first tetrapod reported from the Bahariya since 1935. Does this mean first new tetrapod genus, or is it really the first specimen of a tetrapod found there in over 70 years? Wasn't Deltadromeus, for one, found there? Dinoguy2 (talk) 12:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation[edit]

" It is also possible that Paralititan was hunted by large predatory dinosaurs such as, Bahariasaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, andSpinosaurus, though this would only be possible if the mentioned predators were able to hunt in groups of at least several individuals".

I don't think there is a scintilla of evidence to support any of this. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]