User talk:Ironzombie39

March 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Anthem of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Anthem of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was changed by Ironzombie39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9634 on 2024-03-06T01:20:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Request

For the flag you did add more context, but rather than say "civil" make it "national flag" and since its the National flag i would suppose it should be on top rather than State flags which are only shown in Gov buildings and not international meetings, country, representations and such. CtasACT (talk) 02:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

The Lion of Judah Flag (the state flag) was used more than the Civil Flag and thus it was the National Flag. Ironzombie39 (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

I would disagree with your point since again i gave a thread in the talk page from Scholarly sources which have clearly distinguished the difference between the Lion of Judah as (state) and the "civil" flag as the National flag, this is according to Stanley Chojnacki, a Professor Emeritus, and Whitney Smith an expert on Vexillology. And in addition: Chapter VIII Article 124 of the 1955 Constitution has clearly said the "civil" flag is the flag of the Empire which is what National flags are. And to your point of it was used more than the civil flag, that is not what is presented according to These list of official images (Elizabeth II and Prince Phillp the Duke of Edinburg and Emperor Selassie visit, Queen Elizabeth II and Haile Selassie I, Haile Selassie state visit to Yugoslavia: Arrival ceremony for Haile Selassie I, Emperor of Ethiopia, 12:00PM | JFK Library, exc...) So the overwhelming evidence is that the plain, green, yellow, red flag was not only the National flag but the flag predominately used for official state visits of the head of state that being Emperor Haile Selassie. But i would appreciate it if you placed the Plain flag ontop. CtasACT (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring -Sasanian Empire

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm not trying to get into an Edit War though. if it seems that way, sorry. Just a little frustrated that the other user was using the wrong translation for "šahr" Ironzombie39 (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Your recent editing history at Syria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 23:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

M.Bitton (talk) 00:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)