Template talk:Taxonomy/Animalia

Template-protected edit request on 20 August 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove Myllokunmingia and Palaeospondylus from the taxonomy bar on the animal page. They are both under craniates, so listing them is not necessary. 2601:58C:C480:CC7:F85D:66C3:660E:D112 (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Taxonomy/Animalia}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Talk:Animal is the page you need. Cabayi (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 21 May 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change parent to "Apoikozoa" instead of filozoa Jmv2009 (talk) 11:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit template-protected}} template. Any change to a widely (150000 page) taxonomy you'd want to raise it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life or some other reasonable talk page and get a consensus that the change is correct Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter coxhead can you fix this too, pls? Jmv2009 (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmv2009: Adl et al. (2018) reject this name; see doi:10.1111/jeu.12691. Their updated classifications are usually widely accepted. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter coxhead: Thanks, so its "Choanozoa", according to the article? Shall we do that then? I redefined Choanozoa...

@Jmv2009: I'd like to look at the article in more depth when I have time, but I am inclined to go with its system. (Check the cladogram at Choanozoa; Choanozoa s.s. can't logically have Choanozoa as a subclade.) Peter coxhead (talk) 19:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter coxhead: Right now it's a placeholder at choanozoa. Would you be able to move the apoikozoa article to it?

@Peter coxhead: looks great. Can you put choanozoa then as parent now?

See my post at Talk:Opisthokont#Clade names and articles. I would much prefer to treat Animalia/Metazoa as having the parent Holozoa, which can be better sourced to Adl et al. (2018). Peter coxhead (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 8 May 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can I edit Alikjdfd (talk) 07:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 27 November 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Rahul Mugale 27.97.130.155 (talk) 16:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 14 June 2020[edit]

This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/plante has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

106.210.97.123 (talk) 07:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. TheImaCow (talk) 07:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 30 June 2021[edit]

{{Hb8hgvvjhgvv

Template protection[edit]

Suggestion: It may Also be good to protect templates because it can keep away spammers. Mothjar (talk) 06:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit taxonomy for Buchanania Lanzan[edit]

This is a plant that is incorrectly classified as an animal on its wiki page . 71.29.254.46 (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 15 December 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change Animalia to insect- it is false science, giving people a false perception, incorrect and deceptive to label ANY parasite arachnoid insects in the Animalia kingdom, this includes all insects and fungi 75.97.190.209 (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What would happen if one of them bit a human or stung a human or whatever they do[edit]

I've been doing nothing but studying those and those like them cuz I have placing them infection like them and I think they're responsible 2600:1004:B16B:BD8B:381C:3BA3:EEAD:358D (talk) 06:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 14 April 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the parent of Animalia to Choanozoa. Choanoflagellates are widely considered to be the closest relatives of Animals and form the aforementioned group. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}} template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand what a "consensus" is in this context. I read the help page and I think I understand, but I just don't know how it would apply here. Do I need other people to support my request? Should I provide citations for my requesty? Both? Please explain. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 03:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]