Talk:Sex differences in leadership

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Left wing bias alert[edit]

This piece is not talk about sex differences in leadership, it is just a stereo typical one-sided “gender studies” hit piece on masculinity. It doesn’t even mention male leadership attributes, which because they are authoritative (agentic) and not communal, are actually considered more effective by employees over communal leadership traits, at least as primary leadership traits. Masculity is more confident, authoritative, assertive, competitive, independent and courageous and that is actually why men make on on average, generally speaking, better managers than women.

I am not an academian but anyone in academia who is not an ideologue and can see the extreme bias in this article should correct it to be more balanced. Beriboe (talk) 18:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Title[edit]

The title, Sex differences in leadership is, at first glance, about sex, which has a word count of 16. The word count for gender = 26. Why this discrepancy? If the contributors writing about gender are not aware that sex and gender are two entirely different matters, don't they feel they are, a priori, quite unqualified to be contributors?--Damorbel (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]