Talk:Reappearance of Muhammad al-Mahdi

Improving

Hi @Mhhossein:. Reappearance of Muhammad al-Mahdi as important subject for shia Muslim had been created and nominated for DYK, but was rejected because it consists of confusing sentences. The main problem is that I don't know which sentence could be vague! Any way I wonder if you help me to indicated confusing sentences. Also if you are absolutely snowed under with your tasks, please give me a favor by introducing person who can help me! Saff V. (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Saff V.: Hey, I'll try to give it a time soon or late. Does the article still have a chance for DYK? --Mhhossein ^talk 07:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

I owe you one! Actually no, DYK was rejected. Saff V. (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

context

I would appreciate more context; for me as a kafir all these ideas sound equally.. way out there. For instance, the idea that TV is one of the signs, would that be a generally held belief in the muslim world, or at least a proposition that has some merit or plausibility? Is it taken seriously at all? Or are such matters too contentious to even give a broad indication? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D458:C1B4:1AFA:842B (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The TV claim is probably not a contentious statement. It's also probably not a widely-held belief but just because the detailed signs of reappearance is not a topic that gets a lot of attention in the Muslim world. In that sense, it's current coverage in the article is more or less reasonable as is. But you can, of course, find much more elsewhere on the web about this particular topic. Albertatiran (talk) 09:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)