Talk:Pseudolaw

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative Views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Legalese[edit]

How the two relate? Zezen (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Legalese is an informal term for the cryptic and sometimes counter-intuitive nature of Legal writing or Legal English.[1] Pseudolaw often involves "legal-sounding gibberish".[2] It is covered in the article by the phrase "legalistic gibberish". Without a formal source explicitly discussing the relationship between pseudolaw and legalese, there is not much that can be done to edit the article, and that is the purpose of this talk page. BiologicalMe (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not think that this entire article avoids pointing out that law education in schools from 5 year olds to end of secondary school needs raising?

Also, you ask the difference between pseudolaw and legalese, but as we know, there is a vast difference between legalese words and those same words used in normal, plain English dictionaries such as the Oxford or Cambridge dictionaries. If you were to use a word from the plain English dictionaries in a Court the court would presume different meanings, this highlights that 'gibberish' language is implied depending on how the Court chooses to interpret it. 2A00:23C8:A10E:CE01:44EF:3F71:E339:CE68 (talk) 03:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

"Sovereign Citizen" notice, Belfast (October 2013) (geograph 5824402).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Covid denial pseudolegal notice in Burbank California.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]