Talk:Occupy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Untitled[edit]

not sure if double disambiguation is appropriate. Let's talk this out. Occupy disambiguates to occupation, which is itslef a disambig. MPS (talk) 16:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I still favor making "Occupy" a redirect to "Occupy Wall Street"; it's quite simple to fix navigation problems with a hatnote directing people to "Occupation" for other uses. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 19:02, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reponse. One more data point for you... there are currently exactly four articles that link through to occupy...

‎:: Given that there are only four links that would be redirected (none of which have anything to do with OWS), I am not sure that this debate deserves much more thought. Let's leave this as a double disambig and move on to editing and improving other wikipedia articles??? Peace, MPS (talk) 19:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is obviously a developing event - let's see what happens as we move forward. (It's not just link-throughs but searches as well.) –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 19:17, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Peace, MPS (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2013 discussion[edit]

Items currently under "Occupation (disambiguation), various meanings" about protest should be merged or moved to the occupy page. People have been doing sit-in or occupy protests around the world before it was coined to mean a specific movement initiated in the United States. The current content does not reflect history before the last five years. Alixos (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]