Talk:List of in-memory databases

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Request edit on 20 January 2020[edit]

Requesting the addition of a new row for Apache Geode.

Edit request

It is one of the top-level projects under the Apache Software Foundation. It is an in-memory database that has existed for a long time and has a significant market presence and multiple articles published. I do have a conflict of interest as I am a contributor to Apache Geode and an employee of VMware.

Apache Geode Apache Software Foundation, VMware 2015 Java, C++, .NET, NodeJS Open Source (Apache License Version 2.0) Apache Geode provides a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency performance with high concurrency processing. Apache Geode is a data management platform that provides real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.

Geode pools memory, CPU, network resources, and optionally local disk across multiple processes to manage application objects and behavior. It uses dynamic replication and data partitioning techniques to implement high availability, improved performance, scalability, and fault tolerance. In addition to being a distributed data container, Apache Geode is an in-memory data management system that provides reliable asynchronous event notifications and guaranteed message delivery. Apache Geode is a mature, robust technology originally developed by GemStone Systems. Commercially available as GemFire™, it was first deployed in the financial sector as the transactional, low-latency data engine used in Wall Street trading platforms. Today Apache Geode technology is used by hundreds of enterprise customers for high-scale business applications that must meet low latency and 24x7 availability requirements.[1]

References

  1. ^ "Apache Geode". geode.apache.org. Retrieved 2020-01-31.

Nabarun13 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 4-FEB-2020[edit]

  Edit request declined  

  • The proposed entry does not appear to be independently notable in Wikipedia. All of the entries on the list (except for one) are independently notable. The one which is not independently notable contains two references which appear to be independent of the subject. The source provided with the proposed entry is the company itself.
  • Thus, the proposed entry does not appear to meet either of the requirements enforced upon the current entries of this list.

Regards,  Spintendo  19:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]