Talk:Freedom of religion in Bulgaria

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citations Missing[edit]

Although I have no dispute with any information in this article, to meet Wikipedia's standards, citations of credible sources are necessary. There is a Wikipedia citation formatting wizard here: http://toolserver.org/~magnus/makeref.php Downstrike (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Needs Major Rewrite[edit]

This article is an almost verbatim copy of sections of the 2010 International Religious Freedom Report by the US Department of State, which is its sole reference. As such, the article suffers from several issues:

It is out of date. Persistent references to the "reporting period" in the article refer to a point in time 12+ years ago.
Its neutrality may be in question. The sole source represents one set of conclusions, and there are no other sources to either corroborate or challenge those conclusions.
Because it is a verbatim copy, it has numerous grammatical issues - such as the consistent use of past tense - which makes sense within the referenced report, but not in an encyclopedia article.

Chernorizets (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]