Talk:Encounter (psychology)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Continental philosophy

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tags[edit]

Hi. There were some tags on the page added March 2008 about the concept being vague and perhaps independent research. I've made the intro clearer: this isn't a vague term, it's a specific idea, and there are surely enough references to demonstrate that it's not independent research. Please post any questions to this discussion page. Whitespace (talk) 00:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'd be better off taking the "references" currently on the page and expanding and elaborating on the topic. References is in quotes because their use was not as references, they were examples of theories that use the concepts. The page would be better were those examples fleshed out without engaging in original research, and if the references were embedded as inline citations using citation templates with the books as sources. WLU (t) (c) ^{(rules - simple rules)} 02:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]