Talk:Burn bag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rewording[edit]

The movie Spy Game is the only instance where a burn bag is prominently used, abeit in an illegal manner.

I have changed the illegal to unintended, because there probably is no law anywhere that explicitly forbids the use of burn bags for any purpose other than to store documents for destuction. The bag was just being used in a manner that the makers did not expect (they did not intend it to be used that way), that's all. It was not being used in a way that broke any law (which would justify using the word "illegal"). Kimchi.sg 20:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This probably should have had a citation before it was displayed on the main page - IIRC in the movie "Clear and Present Danger" Jack Ryan uses a burn bag.--Thud495 20:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

image[edit]

here is a great image of a burn bag in real life. I assume it is a government photo. Maybe we can track it down. Kingturtle = (talk) 05:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added to article.--Banana (talk) 06:48, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burn bag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]