This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgrade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgrade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgradeWikipedia:WikiProject BelgradeTemplate:WikiProject BelgradeBelgrade articles
The list of parties kind of looks wieldy and WP:WALLOFTEXT. Is there any way to keep this concise? Borgenland (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's appropriate to use the actual names of the electoral lists. It's not especially unwieldy (people can still identify the sponsoring parties and coalitions easily enough), and it's consistent with the approach on other results pages. If this is seen as an issue, maybe having hidden text would be the best approach? CJCurrie (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}