User talk:TwoScars
The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
In appreciation[edit]
|
The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Battle of Antietam retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Battle of Fayetteville (1862)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Fayetteville (1862) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZombiUwU -- ZombiUwU (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company[edit]
The article J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company for comments about the article, and Talk:J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZombiUwU -- ZombiUwU (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Early glassmaking in the United States[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Early glassmaking in the United States you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 12:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Early glassmaking in the United States[edit]
The article Early glassmaking in the United States you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Early glassmaking in the United States and Talk:Early glassmaking in the United States/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Fayetteville (1862)[edit]
The article Battle of Fayetteville (1862) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Fayetteville (1862) and Talk:Battle of Fayetteville (1862)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Early glassmaking in the United States[edit]
The article Early glassmaking in the United States you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Early glassmaking in the United States for comments about the article, and Talk:Early glassmaking in the United States/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 02:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jenkins' Trans-Allegheny Raid[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jenkins' Trans-Allegheny Raid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Fayetteville (1862)[edit]
The article Battle of Fayetteville (1862) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Fayetteville (1862) for comments about the article, and Talk:Battle of Fayetteville (1862)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ratcliffe Manor[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ratcliffe Manor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ratcliffe Manor[edit]
The article Ratcliffe Manor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ratcliffe Manor for comments about the article, and Talk:Ratcliffe Manor/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 19:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jenkins' Trans-Allegheny Raid[edit]
The article Jenkins' Trans-Allegheny Raid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jenkins' Trans-Allegheny Raid for comments about the article, and Talk:Jenkins' Trans-Allegheny Raid/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Third Winchester[edit]
Done. FYI, there were several instances of single page citations to the same source, one right after the other, that I consolidated. I will now be tweaking the page and forming {{sfnmp| }} consolidations where possible.Boo Boo (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Would you mind giving this a read-through? I'm hoping to run it through FAC soon as several of the sources need to be back to the library by May 17. Hog Farm Talk 13:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- I’m vacationing in Europe right now. Be back in 2 weeks. From my phone, things look ok. I like having subheaders if there are more than two paras in a section. Like maps too. If still needed, I’ll look when I get back. TwoScars (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- “ Some Confederates, including DeMorse, suggested that the brutality was a result of outrage at the looting down by the “ — “down” or “done” TwoScars (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- No worries - I've added a map and fixed the error above. I hope you enjoy your trip! Hog Farm Talk 01:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: I'm back. Anything I can do to help with Battle of Poison Spring? I looked for maps at LOC Civil War Maps, but did not find much. There is a hand-drawn map of Steele's route from a museum at Camden, but I doubt it can be used. I was hoping to find something that showed troop positions, but could not find anything. TwoScars (talk) 16:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I had no luck on maps, either. If you have the time, I'd appreciate it if you could give it a quick skim just to make sure the context is sufficient/everything seems OK. It's a bit of a trickier subject area than I usually deal with considering the related war crimes, so I want to make sure I get things right on it. Hog Farm Talk 17:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: A quick check using MS Word: In the Prelude section: "forgaing" is used twice instead of "foraging", and "totalled" is used instead of "totaled". Also, Union "soliders" is used instead of Union "soldiers". TwoScars (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- In the Battle section: "roadline" is used, but I think it should be "road line". In the Massacre section I would use " soldiers' " instead of " soldiers's ". In the Aftermath and preservation section it says "infantryment" instead of "infantrymen" or "infantry". TwoScars (talk) 18:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reading the article: In the Background section: "By early 1864, it was unlikely that the Confederacy would win the American Civil War against the Union was slimming and the Confederate situation in Arkansas was particularly bad." Probably been changed multiple times. Maybe "By early 1864, the likelihood that the Confederacy would win the American Civil War was slimming, and the Confederate situation in Arkansas was particularly bad." TwoScars (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure if important: I did not know that the Arkansas River divides Arkansas in half—I looked it up. I wondered about how many men Steele had until I saw Footnote A and jumped down to the order of battle—three divisions? I have been told to not put three separate citations together, but to combine them instead. It looks like the most you have is two. TwoScars (talk) 19:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Under the Prelude section: "While Confederates soldiers searched" could be either "While Confederate soldiers searched" or "While the Confederates searched". TwoScars (talk) 19:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Under the Battle section: Maybe "roadline" could be replaced with "edge of the road". "road line" seems weird. TwoScars (talk) 19:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- The Initial maneuvers subsection under the Battle section is where I wish there was a map that showed all the unit's positions—instead of the American Battlefield Protection Program map. It would help people who are not familiar with the USA and CSA leaders know who was on which side. TwoScars (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Under the Confederate attacks section: "While trying to reach the 18th Iowa to order the regiment to be reposition, Williams's horse" has one and a half issues. The Blue Book of Grammar and Punctuation says The Associated Press Stylebook recommends just an apostrophe: It's Tennessee Williams' best play. But most other authorities endorse Williams's. Williams's means “belonging to Williams.” It is not the plural form of Williams. People's names become plural the way most other words do. So "Williams's" is probably OK. The full issue is "reposition". Either "While trying to reach the 18th Iowa to order the regiment to be repositioned, Williams's horse" or "While trying to reach the 18th Iowa to order the repositioning of the regiment, Williams's horse".... TwoScars (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Under Confederate attacks: "terrain was reached that the guns could not be taken over and continued for Camden" is probably OK, but at first I thought the "taken over" part was about gaining control of the guns instead of being able to haul the guns over the terrain. TwoScars (talk) 20:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably not necessary, might be good for people not familiar with Kansas. Under the Massacre section: "history of hatred between Missourians and Kansans that dated back to Bleeding Kansas." Maybe "history of hatred between Missourians and Kansans that dated back a decade to a time called "Bleeding Kansas". " TwoScars (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Under Aftermath and preservation: "transferred three divisions on infantry from Louisiana to fight against Steele" - "of" instead of "on". TwoScars (talk) 20:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also "with the Confederate infantryment" - "infantrymen" instead of "infantryment". TwoScars (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- "Steele's men reached Little Rock on May 3; DeBlack describes the Camden Expedition as the "greatest Federal military disaster of the Civil War in Arkansas". Might be OK, or could be two sentences. TwoScars (talk) 20:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: That is all I have. The Highlight Duplicate Links tool finds no duplicates. Recently I have been told that duplicate links are OK if they are in a different section, but I still like to have no duplicates. TwoScars (talk) 20:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I had no luck on maps, either. If you have the time, I'd appreciate it if you could give it a quick skim just to make sure the context is sufficient/everything seems OK. It's a bit of a trickier subject area than I usually deal with considering the related war crimes, so I want to make sure I get things right on it. Hog Farm Talk 17:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: I'm back. Anything I can do to help with Battle of Poison Spring? I looked for maps at LOC Civil War Maps, but did not find much. There is a hand-drawn map of Steele's route from a museum at Camden, but I doubt it can be used. I was hoping to find something that showed troop positions, but could not find anything. TwoScars (talk) 16:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- No worries - I've added a map and fixed the error above. I hope you enjoy your trip! Hog Farm Talk 01:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 217, May 2024[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)