User talk:Peter G Werner/2011-2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]

Hello, Peter G Werner/2011-2014! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Campus Ambassador needed[edit]

Hi! My name is Annie Lin - I'm the Campus Team Coordinator at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm contacting you because you're listed as a resident of San Francisco, and we're currently looking for a friendly Wikipedian to teach students in a University of San Francisco class how to use/edit Wikipedia. This is a role titled the "Wikipedia Campus Ambassador," and you'll basically be doing in-class presentations about Wikipedia, running Wikipedia labs/workshops, and in general providing face-to-face Wikipedia help for the professor and the students in the class. The time commitment is about 3-5 hours a week (with variations throughout the semester), and for this particular University of San Francisco class, most of the workload will be between March and May.

Please let me know if you're interested!

Thanks. Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not interested. 3-5 hours per week, week in week out, and unpaid is a huge commitment, even if it was on my own campus (Merritt College). Second issue, you're additionally asking me to do this on a campus (USF) I have no connection with whatsoever, and to commit 3-5 hours per week to that. It simply amazes me that Wikimedia Foundation is asking this of people. I'm not sure how many volunteers you're getting this way, but you'd probably get more if you allowed for varying levels of commitment. Also, avoid assigning people to spend time on campuses they have no connection to! Peter G Werner (talk) 08:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Peter G Werner (talk) 06:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Party of America[edit]

Dear Peter,

I reviewed Drucker's book, which is visible at Amazon (with a page limit). I found some page numbers which may be useful to our readers.

  1. Harrington and the majority caucuses had opposing viewpoints in nearly every issue of New America. [page 307]
  2. McReynolds quit in 1970. [page 305 (McReynolds's SPUSA-Oregon blog states repeatedly that he quite in 1971, but this must be wrong, because several newspaper accounts quote his departure in 1970.)]


I am glad that we both like Drucker's biography of Shachtman, which succeeds in understanding a Shachtman despite Drucker's profound differences, as stated in his preface---an understanding that I find admirable and which I should like to do a better job of achieving!

I mention these pages in the book, in case they disagree with what you had written many years ago. If you have time, and if this interests you still, perhaps you would care to revisit these issues?

I should confess to having quite strong admiration and even affection for Michael Harrington, and I hope that these emotions do not cloud my judgement. It's better to confess such possible biases, now, to put you on your guard.

  1. Shachtman and his followers had a strategy was to win a negotiated peace, one which would protect the safety of communists in the South, as noted in 1972 by the NYT. P. 303. Shachtman supported bombing perhaps (p. 305) or perhaps not (p. 303). [I add that the Socialist Party was against bombing by 1966 (as you can see at the convention resolution)]. Drucker says that Harrington won stronger criticism of the Vietnam War in every convention (p. 307)
  2. Harrington compromised with Shachtman and the others through 1972 (p. 307)—much I add (as known from Isserman's biography of Harrington) to the irritation of Irving Howe at Dissent and to the New Left. Harrington and the majority negotiated compromise positions from 68-summer 1972 (307)
  3. I could not find any mention of "Debs caucus" in the book, although McReynolds was mentioned. Perhaps you could re-check your copy, which may have a useful pencil mark or scrap of paper, if we are lucky.... (I have bad eyes and could easily have missed a mention of the Debs Caucus.)
  4. There are some other issues, where I couldn't find a precise statement in Draper to match the history written by you and many other contributors over more than 5 years. However, I think that you can check the history of my revisions and note any changes I've made, and (without undue trouble) please correct any errors I've made (and forgive me for perhaps editing too boldly).

Thanks again for your work on this article, many years ago. I hope that this note brings back pleasant memories, of your editing and of course of the events that interested you in this topic in the first place. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 12:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove what you wish[edit]

Peter,

I should be glad to remove or edit sections, per your request and per common sense, if I may have your permission.

Of course, you have the right to remove all my my postings here, whenever you want, and I consider it generous that you left my complaints here.

I wish and shall now remove my postings, in what I think to be the spirit of your last request. If I have misinterpreted your wishes, then please revert my edits and please accept my apologies.

Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Party of America[edit]

Hi again Peter!

I have made similar edits to the SPA article's talk page, following repeated suggestions by several persons. Would you please complain if I have removed anything improperly. I believe that now you may wish to do similar editing, because your prose refers to now deleted comments. I trust that you or Demiurge1000 may perform similar clean-ups, and then I may finish my clean-ups. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to strike my contributions to the "NPOV Tags" section, if you strike yours and DU1000's. (I did not want to strike only mine.)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC) I went ahead and blanked the section, as I thought was consistent with a consensus. Please revert me if I am wrong and of course accept my apologies if I was in error.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:NeatStuff02.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NeatStuff02.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

Hi Peter, this is just a note to let you know you were mentioned in a recently opened RfC/U on Kiefer.Wolfowitz. I realise you may not wish to revisit the issues from a few months ago, but equally you may choose to comment there.

Sorry to have notified you rather late; Worm was advised that it was best to notify anyone who was mentioned in any detail in the RfC/U, but we got our wires crossed as to who/when/how that would be done. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Nuns, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Demo and Chelsea Hotel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco meetup at WMF headquarters[edit]

Hi Peter G Werner,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP Fungi in the Signpost[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Fungi for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 00:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rubyredstone.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rubyredstone.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Rubyredstone.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rubyredstone.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nerihorse.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Nerihorse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

See Psilocybe allenii; I've also nominated it for GAN, and DYK. Corrections are welcome of course! Cheers, Sasata (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Brands[edit]

Hello, Peter G Werner.

You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:NeriMaryJulia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NeriMaryJulia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance: Amanita muscaria[edit]

This is a note to let the main editors of Amanita muscaria know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 13, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 13, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Amanita muscaria

Amanita muscaria, commonly known as the fly agaric, is a poisonous and psychoactive basidiomycete fungus, one of many in the genus Amanita. Native throughout the temperate and boreal regions of the Northern Hemisphere, Amanita muscaria has been unintentionally introduced to many countries in the southern hemisphere, generally as a symbiont with pine plantations, and is now a true cosmopolitan species. The quintessential toadstool, it is a large white-gilled, white-spotted, usually deep red mushroom, one of the most recognizable and widely encountered in popular culture. Although it is generally considered poisonous, deaths from its consumption are extremely rare, and it is eaten as a food in parts of Europe, Asia, and North America after parboiling. Amanita muscaria is noted for its hallucinogenic properties, with its main psychoactive constituent being the compound muscimol. It was used as an intoxicant and entheogen by the peoples of Siberia and has a religious significance in these cultures. There has been much speculation on traditional use of this mushroom as an intoxicant in places other than Siberia; however, such traditions are far less well documented. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psilocybe mescaleroensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOD Needs You![edit]

Hi there Peter G Werner! I've noticed you have yourself listed as a member of the Food and Drink Wikiproject. Unfortunately it looks like the project has been slowly sliding into inactivity except for a couple of people. That makes me a sad potato, and nobody likes a sad potato amirite?

If you'd like to turn my frown upside down, can you do two small things?

First off, go here and add {{Tick}} (checkY) next to your name if you're still part of the project.

Second, go to the project talkpage and participate in a discussion about how to make the project more active, and how to go about making articles in our area of interest a lot better.

You don't want to make me cry, do you? Potatoes have a lot of eyes you know. So come on, join in! :)

— The Potato Hose 18:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mabuhay Gardens[edit]

Hi Peter G Werner, per the article talk page note, I'm contacting you re: the mass of unsourced content at Mabuhay Gardens. It included anecdotal, original research, and WP:BLP issues, and I've removed a lot of it, hoping that someone with knowledge of and references to the subject can restore content where appropriate. Thanks, 76.248.151.159 (talk) 23:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - September 2013[edit]

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter
Volume III, no. 1 – September 2013

Note: If you would like opt out from receiving future newsletters, please place a note next to your name on the project's participant list.
Project News
  • The project has been updated with new Goals, with target numbers of 500 each for Featured and Good articles, and for 10% of all project-related articles to be improved to B-Class or better.
  • A new Welcome squad section has been added to the project's main page. If interested, please sign on!
  • A new DYK articles page has been created listing food and drink articles that have been featured on Wikipedia's Main page as Did you know entries. Please add new food and drink DYK articles to the list!
  • The project's Top-level importance nominations page has several new entries. New additions and discussion are always welcome.
  • A proposal to create a Chocolate Task Force is currently being discussed.
  • The new ' was created in June 2013.
Breakfast foods
Breakfast foods
  • Please see the project's Tasks and To do sections for project and article tasks, and feel free to update the lists with new entries.
  • Please feel free to contribute to the creation of the newsletter's next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome!
  • The project's previous newsletter was published in August 2008. Its reintroduction has been performed in hopes to increase project participation. Apologies if you did not wish to receive this newsletter (see opt-out message at top).
  • New members who have joined in July–August, 2013:
The project currently has 97 members. Please feel free to welcome the new members!
Also, in July 2013, (at least) 41 new food/drink-related articles were created. To view a listing of them, see New articles. Also, please add new articles to the list when discovering them!
  • Past newsletters:
  • Portals
Portals

Food and drink articles by quality and importance

  • There are currently 26,063 articles and 10,184 stubs attributed to the project.

WP:Food[edit]

It would be appreciated if you joined in the conversation occurring at WT:Food regarding the layout and presentation of the project's main page. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - October 2013[edit]

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter
Volume III, no. 2, October 2013

Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.                                      

Project News

  • An updated front page, A new sister project and updates to our DYK page
— View by clicking [show] —

Article alerts

— View by clicking [show] —

Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Article alerts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.

Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.
  • Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project.
— View by clicking [show] —
The project currently has 87 active members.
— View by clicking [show] —
Past newsletters

Food and drink articles by quality and importance

— View by clicking [show] —
Article statistics
Food and Drink WikiProject
article assessment
Food and drink articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 13 28 48
FL 2 1 3
FM 139 139
A 1 1
GA 13 24 73 251 5 366
B 55 235 331 584 67 1,272
C 81 389 960 2,736 469 4,635
Start 22 322 1,641 9,882 6 3,795 15,668
Stub 17 558 7,849 5,037 13,461
List 11 69 110 468 23 271 952
Category 9 1 7,649 7,659
Disambig 157 157
File 2,996 2,996
Portal 614 614
Project 384 384
Redirect 10 71 543 2,683 3,307
Template 948 948
Other 4 192 196
Assessed 183 1,084 3,758 22,346 15,791 9,644 52,806
Unassessed 20 2,019 2,039
Total 183 1,084 3,758 22,366 15,791 11,663 54,845
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 182,185 Ω = 5.14

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rim Fire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Park Reopens Areas Affected by Rim Fire]. U.S. National Park Service: Yosemite National Park.(</ref> Some mushroom hunters state they would be willing to sign [[liability waivers]] in order to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Domingo Castillejo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nurseries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Domingo Castillejo in English Wikipedia[edit]

Hi Peter, thanks for your message. I was looking for a good biography of this author for a long time and I had no success. The one you found is very interesting, that even provides a source to the city where Domingo was born. I'm not so good in English as en:wikipedia requires, so if you consider it relevant here is the translation of the text I added with that source. «Domingo Castillejo began his studies in medicine at the Royal College of Surgery of the Navy in Cadiz the 5 of May of 1759 and delivered his pre-graduation public lecture the 29 of September of 1763. After graduating he was appointed Second Surgeon in the College of Surgery the 14 of May of 1764 and that same year he received the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy.» Thanks again and greetings.Falconaumanni (Carlos para los amigos) 09:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic! I'll add that information. Peter G Werner (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Peter_G_Werner/2011-2014&oldid=1076054621"