User talk:FlightTime/Archive 40

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
← Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 →


New message from Discospinster

Hello, FlightTime. You have new messages at Discospinster's talk page.
Message added 01:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

... discospinster talk 01:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CaseOh

Hey - you just reverted Special:Diff/1214706230, though in my edit summary I mentioned it was calculated from the VentureJolt source. Did you perhaps mean to revert a different edit? stwalkerster (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanx :P - FlightTime (open channel) 17:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from WiinterU

@FlightTime: Hello, this is Winter. I have noticed that some of your edits to McDonald's may have negatively affected the article. The company type and key people sections always have to be linked according to the documentation here. WiinterU (talk) 03:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WiinterU: Please convey your concerns to @Ohconfucius:, the author of the script used. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 00:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Hellbus

I forget how I ended up on your talk page, but I have to say Daisy looks just like my sister's dog Poppy. Please give your flower girl a treat on behalf of the one in my life. Hellbus (talk) 03:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done She says thanx, give your's a hug for a stranger :) - FlightTime (open channel) 00:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Bazkar gromti ovar

Quick ping to understand if you are still willing to discuss the changes to the Signs (Five Man Electrical Band song) article as per my talk page. Bazkar gromti ovar (talk) 15:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deep purple Machine head

Hi my name is red Jenkins so on the page for deep purple’s album machine head there has been an IP address that has been posting a discrepancy on the release date The album was released on march 25 but the person keeps on saying that it was released in April 1972 I just wanted to know if you could give me a definite answer if it was released in March or April 1972 because I don’t wanna keep on putting heads with the guy thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reedjenkins1234 (talkcontribs) 14:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reedjenkins1234: 25 March 1972 - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 15:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chrysler Building

Really appreciate your "Thanks" for the Chrysler Building edit. Best Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from QwertyForest

@FlightTime: Hi! I noticed that you reverted my edit to the username policy, stating that the previous link was not broken and linking to a guideline about bypassing redirects. I think there may have been a misunderstanding here. The previous link goes to the section of the sockpuppetry policy that deals with legitimate alts as a whole. This can create confusion. Also, when viewed on a mobile, the paragraph about doppelganger accounts is not visible. However, the redirect I replaced it with goes to the paragraph about doppelganger accounts. This improves clarity and navigation, particularly for mobile users. I hope this has cleared something up. QwertyForest (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QwertyForest: Best send them to the beginning of the section, they know what they're looking for. FYI no need to ping a user on their own talk page. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Cheeseburger for you!

The Master of Hedgehogs (converse) (hedgehogs) 13:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that pages created by now blocked users are not eligible for WP:G5 deletion; they need to be evading an already-existing block. I don't necessarily think it needed a U5 as was later done, but I'm not that fussed. Just thought I'd mention the G5 part. Primefac (talk) 13:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Dour1234

This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

@FlightTime:, I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the page about J. R. R. Tolkien. I cited the secondary source where I found the name Philip from, "What’s in a Name? Tolkien and St. Philip Neri" by Dr. Holly Ordway. On my talk page, you claimed that my edit was disruptive. Despite that, however, I do not see how it was disruptive in any way. I followed the cite web template when citing the source and I kept the page at J. R. R. Tolkien because that is the name that most people know him as. If you explain all this to me as well as what I need to do to add the name to the page, that would great. I look forward to and await your response.Dour1234 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dour1234 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just off the bat why in the fuck did you change his name ? - FlightTime (open channel) 20:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not change the name of the page, but I have added some information that wasn’t previously on the page. I noticed on many Wikipedia pages that while the page name is the most well known name, the bolded name is almost always the full name of the person the page is about.Dour1234 (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you're wrong. Please stop posting here, use the article talk page - FlightTime (open channel) 20:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from Dour1234

This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

@FlightTime:, I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the page about J. R. R. Tolkien. I cited the secondary source where I found the name Philip from, "What’s in a Name? Tolkien and St. Philip Neri" by Dr. Holly Ordway. On my talk page, you claimed that my edit was disruptive. Despite that, however, I do not see how it was disruptive in any way. I followed the cite web template when citing the source and I kept the page at J. R. R. Tolkien because that is the name that most people know him as. If you explain all this to me as well as what I need to do to add the name to the page, that would great. I look forward to and await your response.Dour1234 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dour1234 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just off the bat why in the fuck did you change his name ? - FlightTime (open channel) 20:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not change the name of the page, but I have added some information that wasn’t previously on the page. I noticed on many Wikipedia pages that while the page name is the most well known name, the bolded name is almost always the full name of the person the page is about.Dour1234 (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you're wrong. Please stop posting here, use the article talk page - FlightTime (open channel) 20:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Just noting that pages created by now blocked users are not eligible for WP:G5 deletion; they need to be evading an already-existing block. I don't necessarily think it needed a U5 as was later done, but I'm not that fussed. Just thought I'd mention the G5 part. Primefac (talk) 13:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 98Tigerius

There's an error on the file page I requested to be move, please double check it. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 20:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@98Tigerius:  Fixed - FlightTime (open channel) 13:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from W;ChangingUsername

Please discuss this on the talk page, not here. This discussion/section is closed - FlightTime (open channel) 16:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Please revert my edits to the erythema migrans page. You couldn't have read the page (how it is now) if you think it's in any way acceptable, and, using your own "personal opinions aren't valid sources" - the page was clearly written by someone who got a tick bite, or keeps getting conditions, and spent too much time editing the page with their own findings. I didn't reference it, but I revealed my source in the discussion on my talk page in response to your comment. In my opinion, my version of thr page is much better, and, for the record, the information I added did come from a source and not my own things that I made up except for the "right ear" part. Thr right ear being affected is something I may have read somewhere I don't know.

I'm not bothered about the methamphetamine pregnancy category think and I know thst was a risky edit. I'm sorry for thst edit. I'm also sorry for the STATE that erythema migrans is in. W;ChangingUsername (talk) 16:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W;ChangingUsername: The correct thing to do is open a discussion with your concerns on the article talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Revert the edit to be the current, and ill do that. That way i can discuss this with YOU as well. Tell me whats wrong with the page and ill make it better. The page makes me feel sick. The source for all of the information was written down from the OCHM and maybe the NHS website. No offense, but the page as it is now seems to be written with more personal anecdotes and the editors own experiences than my version
I'm not going back to the page even though I worked hard on it. If the edit it reverted, though, I can go back and make changes which need to be made if you would like me to do that. W;ChangingUsername (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know the article subject, I just know we don't accept OR. Regular page watchers will discuss your concerns. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then the article as it stands does not meet wikipedia guidelines
I am citing sources, throughout every sentence I added to the page. I've said I am. The article is very neglected W;ChangingUsername (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss this on the talk page, not here. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.