User talk:FailedMusician
Welcome![edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hopper (company) (September 5)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hopper (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hopper (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, FailedMusician!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nyanardsan (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Glenn Fogel for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Fogel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:PhocusWire[edit]
Hello, FailedMusician. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PhocusWire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:PhocusWire[edit]
Hello, FailedMusician. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PhocusWire".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on Havana Syndrome[edit]
FailedMusician, you are definitely not a FailedWikipedian. BootsED (talk) 21:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks FailedMusician (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
Your userpage is very interesting :) User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 01:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Your previous editing[edit]
Since I am not in dispute with you (AFAIK) and have never been, hopefully you will be more receptive to my questions. I'm assuming you've read WP:CLEANSTART so you can ensure you are in-compliance. Can you confirm you are not under any active sanction for any accounts you have used previously? Can you also confirm that you never received any indefinite sanction targeting you as a person with any IPs you've used previously? Can you also confirm that there are no significant expired sanctions you received previously. I'd consider sanctions lasting 1 week or more as significant, whether combined or separate. Finally can you confirm you did not previously edit the Havana Syndrome topic area in any significant way? Even better, it would be great if you can find a trusted admin who's willing to briefly review your previous accounts and confirm there is no problem with your application of cleanstart and then send them a list privately by email. Nil Einne (talk) 20:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- BTW, if you're uncertain why I feel it's important you answer any of these, feel free to ask. Nil Einne (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nil Einne, Thank you for reaching out and for your diligent oversight. I'm fully committed to maintaining transparency and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including the principles outlined in WP:CLEANSTART, which I think is irrelevant to me.
- 1: Active Sanctions: I can confirm that I am not under any active sanction for any accounts I have previously used.
- 2: Indefinite Sanctions: I also confirm that I have never received any indefinite sanction targeting me as a person or any IPs I have used previously.
- 3: Expired Sanctions: Additionally, I can confirm there are no significant expired sanctions that I have received.
- 4: Editing Specific Topic Areas: Regarding the Havana Syndrome topic area, I confirm that I have not edited this topic in any significant way previously.
- 5: Adherence to Wikipedia’s Principles of Consensus: As a point I would like to add to this discussion, I would like to highlight my commitment to Wikipedia's principle of consensus, as outlined in WP:CONSENSUS. This principle emphasizes the importance of reaching a consensus through polite discussion and rational compromise, which is fundamental to the operation of any Wikipedia project. I ensure my editing and interactions always align with this core policy.
- I appreciate your suggestion regarding the review of my previous accounts by a trusted admin. I will take steps to find a trusted admin who is willing to review my history and confirm compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I will communicate with them privately by email as you suggested. Please be sure to append the offline message template to my talk page if you chose to email me.
- If there are any details or clarifications you require, please feel free to ask. FailedMusician (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hopper (company) (April 25)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hopper (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: China and the Opioid epidemic in the United States has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes (talk / cont) 22:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of China and the opioid epidemic in the United States[edit]
Hello FailedMusician,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, China and the opioid epidemic in the United States, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Opioid epidemic in the United States. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Slatersteven (talk) 10:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yesuf Fitfit (April 28)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yesuf Fitfit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Harresment[edit]
As you have edited the following pages (tin the last 24 hours, let alone this week), I have not visted.
United States sanctions against China
Anti-fentanyl legislation in the United States
Fringe theories/Noticeboard
Nor have I nominated (or has any activity on another page you have created, in the last 24 hours)
Draft:Yesuf Fit
Its a bit of to say I am following you about. Slatersteven (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- You deliberately put a "speedy delete" tag on the China fentanyl page to harass me and my efforts. It is really very obvious for anyone to see. FailedMusician (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of China and the opioid epidemic in the United States for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China and the opioid epidemic in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.LegalSmeagolian (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
LLM usage[edit]
Are you using an LLM to create responses to queries and noticeboard discussions? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. I just use ChatGPT to correct my grammar and spelling. FailedMusician (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- [1] [2] [3] and your recent contributions to WP:AN appear wholly created by chatgpt. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, I mainly use it for correcting grammar and spelling. FailedMusician (talk) 23:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you continue to use an LLM to create responses or content, as you have obviously done, you will be blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have not used an LLM to "create" content as you claimed. I used ChatGPT to refine my grammar and spelling. There is no policy against this. FailedMusician (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you continue to use an LLM to create responses or content, as you have obviously done, you will be blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, I mainly use it for correcting grammar and spelling. FailedMusician (talk) 23:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- [1] [2] [3] and your recent contributions to WP:AN appear wholly created by chatgpt. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Sources for Draft:Yesuf Fitfit[edit]
An IP has just suggested that the sources you cited in your draft are 'ChatGPT generated'. [4] A quick Google/Google Scholar check seems not to provide any evidence to the contrary. To avoid any doubt though, could you please either provide links to the articles you cited, or otherwise explain as to how they can be accessed? AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)FailedMusician (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
To rectify any mistakes I made and continue contributing positively. FailedMusician (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The message above indicates that it is likely you used false citations, which is something taken very seriously. Any unblock request will need to directly address that (and any other issues), not be a generic "I'll do better, trust me." Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
. FailedMusician (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- It would probably assist your request if you could provide a response to my request above for clarification regarding the sources cited in Draft:Yesuf Fitfit. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- ... and the results of the "review" you said you'd be conducting into the copyvio you (or your software) did here.[5] In light of this problem, your alt account(s) should probably be disclosed too. Bon courage (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Related to that when I saw this come up, it reminded of the recent ANI where we discussed FM's WP:CLEANSTART violations. Using software generated text can come across as an attempt to avoid comparison to their previous account(s) in terms of mannerisms, and even if it's not the case, the insistence on this despite the problems caused is just odd.
- One top of all the combative issues that came up at ANI, a recent block warning, and this block in part because of the WP:IDHT responses over at SFR's talk page, the indef makes sense. ScottishFinnishRadish, I think at ANI the CLEANSTART issues were largely just left be, but if copyright issues with an LLM are an issue here (on top of previous issues) would that be a valid reason for a CheckUser similar to a sockpuppet investigation? It's an odd situation in terms of what is considered "normal" for SPI/clean starts, but the continued red flags about this account continuing past behavior from their previous account leave me wondering if problems are being missed whether its copyright or behavior. KoA (talk) 16:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know that concerns over copyvio are sufficient for what basically amounts to CU fishing. I don't disagree that we should be aware of the earlier account, but our tools to make that happen are limited. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- ... and the results of the "review" you said you'd be conducting into the copyvio you (or your software) did here.[5] In light of this problem, your alt account(s) should probably be disclosed too. Bon courage (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)