Talk:Training

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Training article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

We should add something about Andragogy here...

Split section on parochial schools[edit]

The section on parochial schools is in the topic of education, not training, and would fit better in an article on education. It may already be there, making this one redundant. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 04:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical context?[edit]

I think this article could benefit from reviewing the historical development of the training industry between the late 1800s and today.

e.g. Dale Carnegie built a training business starting in 1912.

Lauchlanmack (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

e.g. https://msu.edu/~sleightd/trainhst.html Lauchlanmack (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The training pictogram should be moved to a different location within the article[edit]

In my opinion, I strongly believe that the training pictogram should be moved to the start of the article before the text reaches the other sections of the article as I feel that the pictogram is in an inappropriate place at present in the 'See also' section of the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide some logical reasoning to support your opinion? · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 16:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edits rejected[edit]

Hi,

I edited this page, on the section of "Occupational skills training" and it was rejected by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie

I inserted a sentence, and provided a reference from an accredited scientific journal from a literature review. I read the page of the editor, and it seems this type of unprofessional censoring is a norm from this editor. I have been a fan of Wikipedia for over a decade and donated to Wikipedia many times. Now, is this immediate rejection a new policy? Who decided that MrOllie should be censoring new inputs?

Please provide me with a sound reason, and bring my trust to Wikipedia.

Doozandeh (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC) User: Zarathustra55[reply]

@Zarathustra55: I have moved your post here, this talk page is the place to try to seek consensus for your changes. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 15:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What training have you completed since starting to be a social worker[edit]

Life orientation 2C0F:F528:40:618:2D85:879E:495A:644A (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]