This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Doesn't seem notable--he's an advocate, not an academic, and his notability appears to consist of attending and speaking at a few conferences. And yes, I am mostly raising this because his ideas seem really flaky, sure to have no following within serious economics. Before nominating this article for deletion, let me ask: should we retain this article? --Anthon.Eff (talk) 01:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Business week is announcing one of his next speaking engagements. Obviously the topic is notable enough to have a number of articles in the See Also. And he is a leading expert in the field as a couple of books and various other sources note. Since there are working alternative money systems (including multimillion dollar barter clubs which can be considered alternative money systems), these ideas are not flaky and unworkable, only crowded out by the government run system. (Which even makes some forms of workable currency, like Liberty Dollars, illegal. Just like it's illegal to compete with the post office to deliver mail.) Finally the article itself is thoroughly sourced unlike many articles that do need deletion on wikipedia. CarolMooreDC (talk) 12:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article is a puff piece, full of spin. For example, dropping out of a PhD program is presented as doing "additional course work pursuant to a Doctor of Philosophy". Sounds like most of this was taken from his blog where he claims to have held a "tenured faculty position" at Rochester--hardly likely for someone without a terminal degree. It is clear that he is not a "monetary economist". My guess is that this WP article is one of the key elements helping him to get speaking engagements. In my opinion, the article should be deleted--WP is not a tool for self-promoters.--Anthon.Eff (talk) 18:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Life and Work section will have to go, unless reliable sources can be found. And these shouldn't be self-published.--Anthon.Eff (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I wrote the article because I thought an important personality in the alternative money movement like him could use such an article. I met him maybe 20 years ago a couple times. I'm not setting up speaking gigs for him.
Second, self-published sources are OK for information about people's own activities. If some of the info seems questionable a) one can say that he is the source and b) one can look for better sources, which may have be put up in the last year and a half since article was created. I'll look around. There certainly are a few other sources which note that he is an important individual in this movement, so it's not just him. CarolMooreDC (talk) 02:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks. In your hands now.--Anthon.Eff (talk) 02:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fyi Just looking at it now, I can see that back then I didn't always properly reference things - just using links instead - and will fix that. CarolMooreDC (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
