Talk:The Death of the West

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Comments[edit]

This page is horribly unbalanced and needs serious revision. Throughout there are phrases like "shows that such and such is true", as if it were an undesputable fact. The language of this article needs to be reworked, or the article needs to be deleted. -Ross 5:05 pm PST 11-1-05

I don't think that it is so unbalanced that deletion would be warranted, the words "argues" and "believes" were used enough that I didn't feel as if the wiki were treating the arguments as fact, although I do agree with your basic point that the word choice is poor. Also, statements like "humanistic 'culture of death'" often strike me as brimming with sarcasm, but in the end that's probably how those people actually talk. M0nkey 19: 28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The article is poorly written and badly needs some improvement. I'll try to rewrite it when I have spare time as I've just read the book, and consequently, have a better idea about its content. Vincent Shooter 14:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

This author is pure racist.The death of the "West" is actually the depth of white people,European ethnic groups. Western philosophy,mentality,way of life,rule of law will survive.But not its people because of refusal to have kids.

Refusal to have kids...at the excessive rate of said immigrants that is. Native Europeans have a right to exist in Europe. They shouldn't have to have 10 kids just to keep from being overwhelmed by immigrants that breed like rabbits. The continent can't handle such population growth. Several decades from now, will there be Swedes in Sweden? Austrians in Austria? And Austria will be 95% muslim at this rate. So much for cultural heritage. A majority muslim society WILL NOT behave the same way as it did before that transformation. Western laws, mentality and mores will not survive a major ethnic, religous and cultural invasion as is going on now. Europeans are going extinct, it's not wrong to be upset about that. Unfortunately, Europeans seem to be culturally suicidal.4.242.171.185 18:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)some guy[reply]

Islam is not a genetic trait, and your real problem (and Buchanan's) clearly is the skin color of the immigrants and their children. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 19:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC

I guess alot of this artical has been deleted. its a pitty as it dosnt alow SANE people to make up there own minds! And censorship over anything is never the awnser. Be it White supremisist or radical Muslim. I should be able to read facts from both sides.

Fair use rationale for Image:Death of the West Cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Death of the West Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Racism[edit]

This page doesn't mention that this book is obviously very white supremacist. Can we add information about it on the page, or at least add related categories?

--Amadeus1928 (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]