Talk:Teatro de Arena

Brazil: Arts Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gorditagirl21. Peer reviewers: Dgenners, Jgriffith19.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Edits[edit]

I plan to do a complete overhaul of this article. Since this article is so plain, I will be responsible for trying to translate the Brazilian Portuguese version into English. That would be the first step in improving this article. I will then crosscheck the information on both articles and add viable references. I will also make sure to add a section on theater for Native and Afro-Brazilian people and how it worked into this particular theater. Another section will be dedicated to some of the most famous directors and playwrights that have gone through the theater.I will also make sure to make all the information is accessible to a public audience.

1. ORTIZ, RENATO. "Culture and Society." In Brazil: A Century of Change, edited by Sachs Ignacy, Wilheim Jorge, and Pinheiro Paulo Sérgio, by Anderson Robert N. and Dávila Jerry, 120-40. University of North Carolina Press, 2009. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5149/9780807894118_sachs.10.

2. Ferreira, Mariana Leal, and Dominique Devine. "Theater of the Oppressed as a Rhizome: Acting for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Today." Latin American Perspectives 39, no. 2 (2012): 11-26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23238992.

3."New Books." The Drama Review: TDR 23, no. 1 (1979): 120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1145254.

4. Albuquerque, Severino João. "FROM "ABERTURA" TO "NOVA REPÚBLICA": POLITICS AND THE BRAZILIAN THEATER OF THE LATE SEVENTIES AND EIGHTIES." Hispanófila, no. 96 (1989): 87-95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43808231.

5."Augusto Boal (1931-2009)." Development in Practice 19, no. 4/5 (2009): 442. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27752084.

6. ROUSSIN, ANDRE. "MARCEL ACHARD." La Nouvelle Revue Des Deux Mondes, 1974, 10-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44196677. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorditagirl21 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

I think that the proposed edits will really help improve this article. Due to the shortness of the article, I think that it is in need of all of these changes. I would start on the Portuguese version of the article, but also try to reach out and find English sources to build up the information that way as well! So far these sources look good. Dgenners (talk) 00:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

In addition to translating the Portuguese version, I would also recommend looking for other English sources with information about the theater. But the Portuguese article is a great start, and may even use some good English sources.

Jgriffith19 (talk) 20:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you're off to a good start! There is a part of the first sentence that looks like it needs to be finished. I would also like to see more information about the physical building itself if possible. Additionally, I like the list of productions that you have provided, as it gives a better impression of the importance of the theater.

Jgriffith19 (talk) 21:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

I love the current edits and think that things are headed in the right direction. The timeline really provides a straight-forward way to understand the information. I agree with the above reviewer that there needs to be more about the physical building, but overall great work and keep editing! Dgenners (talk) 17:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]